Motoring3 mins ago
Strictly
25 Answers
I preferred Strictly when non-dancers went on a "journey" and learned and progressed, like Darren Gough. Now the show focuses on beautiful young contestants. Trained dancer Danny Mac is already good enough to be a pro. Louise has danced for ages as a pop star. They focus on Laura Whitmore too as she is pretty. Wrong emphasis now, don't ha think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by vernonk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think it's always been the same.
They've got Ed Balls on this year. The equivalent of previous years' Ann Widdecombe or John Sargeant.
There has always been good dancers on too, hasn't there?
I don't usually watch it. OH watches, and I hear the overspill from his headphones.
I quite enjoyed watching the first hour last night and then realised there was another hour to go. Toooo looonnngg. We could watch a film in that time.
They've got Ed Balls on this year. The equivalent of previous years' Ann Widdecombe or John Sargeant.
There has always been good dancers on too, hasn't there?
I don't usually watch it. OH watches, and I hear the overspill from his headphones.
I quite enjoyed watching the first hour last night and then realised there was another hour to go. Toooo looonnngg. We could watch a film in that time.
I prefer Strictly to have an assortment of talent - even if some of the contestants possess very dubious talent. When the London Marathon was first televised the concentration was on the fun runners - and it was fun! Now it concentrates on the serious runners, so for me it's no longer entertaining and I don't bother to watch. Strictly is entertaining.