News0 min ago
Spoty
18 Answers
Did I imagine it ? in the interview with Mo Farah before the results were announced, did I see a trophy near the fireplace before the camera zoomed in ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nelliebee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Whole show was a shambles. What was Noel Gallagher doing there? He's just a second-rate Beatles tribute act! At times it was more like X Factor than SPOTY. And don't get me started on the shortlist for the top award, why were the drug cheat and tax dodger still included? At least Mo was the right winner from the 12 choices, even if BBC managed to stuff up the presentation.
The Telegraph spell 'slick' differently:
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/s port/20 17/12/1 7/chaot ic-bbc- sports- persona lity-ye ar-sees -sir-mo -farah- cut-cou ld/
http://
The only technical problems were with Mo Farah's interviews.
Re The Telegraph's view:Paula Radcliffe was smiling at her husband and clapping while he was given his supposedly 'sceptical look'. Paula helped Farah a lot while he was an up and coming athlete, so I'd guess that her husband's look was more one of 'I can't believe how far he's come', or maybe even 'Has his little boy pulled the plug out of the wall?'
I don't know why Froome was quizzed on his urine sample while Hamilton escaped questions on his dodgy taxes.
Re The Telegraph's view:Paula Radcliffe was smiling at her husband and clapping while he was given his supposedly 'sceptical look'. Paula helped Farah a lot while he was an up and coming athlete, so I'd guess that her husband's look was more one of 'I can't believe how far he's come', or maybe even 'Has his little boy pulled the plug out of the wall?'
I don't know why Froome was quizzed on his urine sample while Hamilton escaped questions on his dodgy taxes.
The 'sceptical look' needed to be lip read:
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/s port/20 17/12/1 7/sport s-perso nality- year-20 17-live -result s-votin g-winne r/
para 4.
http://
para 4.
Not my favourite programme but it seems bizarre to damn the whole thing because of one hiccup. If I had realised Jonathan Rea was a serious contender I’d have voted for him. His close second shows that the vote wasn’t ‘fixed’ as some claim. Although arguably having a short list does ‘fix’ it to an extent