ChatterBank1 min ago
Video Killed The Radio Star - Mk2
9 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/v ideo_an d_audio /must_s ee/4501 1397/re nowned- film-di rector- wim-wen ders-hi ts-out- at-phon e-photo graphy
What's your word ? (see end of video clip if you don't know what I'm referring to)
What's your word ? (see end of video clip if you don't know what I'm referring to)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Talbot: I assumed people would watch the clip, but the parenthetical item was to assist those who chose to terminate the clip before it finished.
But to help those in similar frame of mind to Talbot, here is a synopsis of the video :- " ...in this guy's opinion, taking pics with smartphones is not photography, so can you find a word for it"
But to help those in similar frame of mind to Talbot, here is a synopsis of the video :- " ...in this guy's opinion, taking pics with smartphones is not photography, so can you find a word for it"
I do and don't agree with him all at the same time. There is less skill in digital photography than in conventional photography, and cameras get simpler and simpler, but we still print out prints. I have walls full of photographs that I've taken, my partner has taken, my mother has taken, so I don't think that's exactly true. filters only make a standard photograph more artistic, so again I'm not sure that what he says is exactly valid, it's slightly like people saying 'that's not art' about modern art because it doesn't look like a constable.
Because of the prevalence of photographing thing now I'd probably call it 'photolifeing' if I had to choose a term, but I think photography works just fine as is, it's just another branch of the art.
Because of the prevalence of photographing thing now I'd probably call it 'photolifeing' if I had to choose a term, but I think photography works just fine as is, it's just another branch of the art.
Ha no Talbot. Here are a couple of examples of photos I’ve taken with my phone:
https:/ /ibb.co /bW4j8z
https:/ /ibb.co /cGWaFe
https:/
https:/
Anybody can take a snap-shot which to them, at the time, might seem to be rather interesting, but will receive a "So what?" response from anyone else seeing it. It's an adage that it's not the camera that creates a meaningful image but the creativity of the person behind the camera. Give Ansel Adams a Kodak Brownie and he probably would have made many magnificent scenic images. As to the comments in the video: I think he's being sort of tongue-in-cheek.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.