Why doesn't Matt Hancock give up with the lies and deceit.
They never had the protective equipment, do not have it now and never will have it.
TV this morning has been a series of medical staff from the lowest position to the highest saying they do not have protection.
They say their colleagues are dying and they are being pressurised to enter virus areas without adequate protection.
The head of Nursing say they have lost trust in the Government and Hancock replies that he does not think she means that.
Asked about the numbers of NHS staff dead or seriously ill he says it can't be proved they contacted it at work!
He says 19 dead staff so far. FOr Gods sake tell people the truth or get out of the job.
I suspect that the govt will prove to have so badly screwed up the country with their austerity policy and their penny-pinching attitude to the public sector (which is now being treated as 'heroes' and being applauded every Thursday) that the public will decide, after the worst is over, that they want a change. Keir Starmer could be regarded as a desirable alternative to the rich boys and 'used car salesmen' we have been putting up with.
"Keir Starmer could be regarded as a desirable alternative to the rich boys and 'used car salesmen' we have been putting up with. " - only 4 Labour PMs have ever won an election and none have ever turned over an 80 seat majority, not even Tory lite St Tony, so good luck with that me old china!
//1.27 Since the beginning of the Covid-19 outbreak, we have delivered over 761 million
items of PPE to ensure our frontline is protected.1 This has included 158 million
masks, 1 million gowns, 135 million aprons and 360 million pairs of gloves.//
the thing is needaclue is that there is huge demand, still I don't expect you to acknowledge the difficulty when you are just scoring political points. Anyway look up the definition of "lie" you will find that it's different to an intention, and opinion, a belief etc
It's what he seems to do, Needa... And he likes to be abrasive; you can imagine what you'd think of him down the pub - one of those offensive types who's full of himself and would never credit anyone opposing his worldview with any possibility of maybe having a point to be discussed. I'm sure in real life he's a nice chap, though - a real nice old china.
16.17 You will have to understand that some just spend their whole life on here, and that's fine if that's what they choose to do, but sometimes they get a little bored, therefore they resort to pulling your post apart just to try and wind you up, I now know who they are and ignore them, just respond to the ones that want a common sense debate. You will get like, give me a link, give me proof etc, they are bored.
athiest, I'm the one trying to create a discussion here. Once again can you tell me what's "lies and deceit" Hancock is guilty of, ideally wit the evidence. Then we are on the same page and ready for a discussion. What we currently have is the standard lefty berates Tory tome.
FF: "Keir Starmer could be regarded as a desirable alternative to the rich boys and 'used car salesmen'" - I must confess that I did not realise that selling used cars was another string to his bow! Still he does qualify as "rich" under the official Labour definition of over £75k pa.