Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Wimbledon Highlights Programmes
11 Answers
Watching some of the older matches, the standard looked so much lower than today that I imagine current low-ranked players would have stood a good chance against champions of the 70s and 80s the way they played then... Another thing: how can the BBC really justify having Heather Watson on as a special guest FOUR times seeing as she's never won anything significant in Singles at Wimbledon? So many more deserving guests they could have chosen, including Anne Jones and Jo Durie. They just had to get BLM into it a few times...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theblip. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Oh flaming Nora. Is that is it now? Every time a non-white face appears on TV, you twits are going to cry PC craziness or BLM over it.
She's the most recognisable current British player (perhaps Jo Konta was unavailable) around, and perhaps she is planning a media career when she retires, so is being groomed by the Beeb for such a role. Also, do you know if older players wanted to be involved? I saw Sue interviewing Billie Jean King recently, so there isn't exactly an ban on older players.
Isn't Annabel Croft part of the BBC team? I don't see you complaining about her, given her lacklustre Wimbledon career.
She's the most recognisable current British player (perhaps Jo Konta was unavailable) around, and perhaps she is planning a media career when she retires, so is being groomed by the Beeb for such a role. Also, do you know if older players wanted to be involved? I saw Sue interviewing Billie Jean King recently, so there isn't exactly an ban on older players.
Isn't Annabel Croft part of the BBC team? I don't see you complaining about her, given her lacklustre Wimbledon career.
//At least Croft won Junior Wimbledon and is a very experienced tv tennis pundit.//
Yup, Watson won Wimbledon mixed doubles so they are about the same standard, so shouldn't Watson be given the chance to become an experienced tv tennis pundit if she so desires?
I'm sorry, but I really think the OP's mention of BLM betrays the real reason they're complaining about Miss Watson's appearances.
Yup, Watson won Wimbledon mixed doubles so they are about the same standard, so shouldn't Watson be given the chance to become an experienced tv tennis pundit if she so desires?
I'm sorry, but I really think the OP's mention of BLM betrays the real reason they're complaining about Miss Watson's appearances.
I am with roopower here. The evening doubles matches brought some light relief to the intensity of the afternoon play. The worst ladies matches, imo, were Chris Everett v Tracy Austin - boring beyond belief with the constant base line play. The best was the likes of Margaret Court v Ann Jones and B J King v Martina Navratilova.
Surely no-one is surprised by the pc behaviour of the BBC?
I do not recall so many international championships say 50 years ago and of course Wimbledon was an amateurs' world. Once the players became professional it opened up the whole game for many more to join the circus so it is hardly surprising that the players have upped their play accordingly.
Surely no-one is surprised by the pc behaviour of the BBC?
I do not recall so many international championships say 50 years ago and of course Wimbledon was an amateurs' world. Once the players became professional it opened up the whole game for many more to join the circus so it is hardly surprising that the players have upped their play accordingly.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.