Jobs & Education1 min ago
Miss Greta Tonight
298 Answers
Anybody going to watch ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Samuraisan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//I would consider manipulation of a child in this way to be abuse, but I'm not an unhinged climate moron willing to exploit my child.//
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts.
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts.
Mozz, I think Andy's "moron" jibe was aimed at Greta's parents, not you. It was not a worthy contribution to the discussion, but Andy does seem to get a bit hot under the collar when presented with any disagreement; that's why he and Naomi are a good match. Neither wants the other to get away with the last word.
Mozz - // //I would consider manipulation of a child in this way to be abuse, but I'm not an unhinged climate moron willing to exploit my child.//
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts. //
You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery.
Unless you have kept it quiet about being a parent to Ms Thunberg, my observation is clearly not aimed at you in any way shape or form - so I am happy to continue to respond to your posts.
For the record, I would anyway - that's not a choice you get to make.
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts. //
You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery.
Unless you have kept it quiet about being a parent to Ms Thunberg, my observation is clearly not aimed at you in any way shape or form - so I am happy to continue to respond to your posts.
For the record, I would anyway - that's not a choice you get to make.
Atheist - // Andy, you seem to be a slightly unhinged enemy of this young woman, with a bit of a fixation on her. //
Nothing I have said on this thread or any other points to me being an 'enemy' of Ms Thunberg - just her parents and their fellow manipulators, I think she is innocent and used.
// You certainly don't have any respect for young people's views. //
Please see the response above.
// Why aren't you writing your music articles, instead of obsessing here? //
I am not 'obsessing' as you put it - and I can actually do more than one thing at a time - and indeed I am doing - in the middle of a feature right now.
Nothing I have said on this thread or any other points to me being an 'enemy' of Ms Thunberg - just her parents and their fellow manipulators, I think she is innocent and used.
// You certainly don't have any respect for young people's views. //
Please see the response above.
// Why aren't you writing your music articles, instead of obsessing here? //
I am not 'obsessing' as you put it - and I can actually do more than one thing at a time - and indeed I am doing - in the middle of a feature right now.
//You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery//
I meant was your post in general aimed towards me, as I said in a subsequent reply, I knew the actual insult wasn't. My point was, and remains that we were in the middle of a civil conversation, when you suddenly explode into a mini rant which had nothing to do with the discussion in hand.
Seems to be a rather random exclamation, and as we were in discussion at the time, surely you can understand why I may have thought your outburst was a part of it.
I meant was your post in general aimed towards me, as I said in a subsequent reply, I knew the actual insult wasn't. My point was, and remains that we were in the middle of a civil conversation, when you suddenly explode into a mini rant which had nothing to do with the discussion in hand.
Seems to be a rather random exclamation, and as we were in discussion at the time, surely you can understand why I may have thought your outburst was a part of it.
Mozz, I tend to type as I think, but I never throw insults at AB'ers, although I am happy to do so at people I am confident won't see what I write.
If you felt my conversational swerve made you uncomfortable, it was absolutely not my intention - please accept my apologies for any offence when none was intended.
If you felt my conversational swerve made you uncomfortable, it was absolutely not my intention - please accept my apologies for any offence when none was intended.
"Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future" -- 13th January 2021
https:/
Unfortunately, no game.
https:/
Unfortunately, no game.
Latest Posts
That's What You Call A Near Miss!
ChatterBank3 mins ago
News9 mins ago
ChatterBank9 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.