What's the point...or benefit...in winning a house of this value if you can't afford the upkeep and council tax?
I remember reading about low income folk in the States winning home makeovers but getting into financial trouble because they could no longer afford their own homes.
Vagus...council/property taxes...and any other costs whether they rent it out or live in it themselves.
If someone lives in/rents a flat how likely are they to have the necessary income?
The current Omaze house is in Wimbledon and worth 3.5 million.
"It is expected that approximately £500,000 will be raised for the charity, which would mean Omaze being paid £125,000. Irrespective of sales, Omaze has guaranteed a minimum total payment of £100,000 for the charity. No purchase necessary."
If they expect to raise £500,000, why do they not just flog the house as, "it’s no wonder that a recent valuation of the house came in at over £3,500,000."?
How on earth do Omaze afford to buy the house (and there's an expensive car as well) and pay for expensive TV adverts? There surely can't be that many paying to enter, can there?
Sqad's offer looks pretty good to me. If as people are arguing the whole thing is going to start falling off a cliff in 10 years or so, it won't be worth 50p.