No appeal to sqad which is kinda hinky
here is my go
1.Comparison is made with previous = I have seen the earlier one.
2.The previously shown... = the fracture is still there (!) and it is still squeeshed
3.With some further reduction in height, particularly anteriorly,= she is like the Queen and is losing height. OK specifically the fracture, it is more squeeshed
4.sclerosis in keeping with maturation = the x ray is whiter around the fracture and this shows it is 'old' or not recent. Maturation is word used as 'getting better' is problematical
5.Alignment is unchanged, = not twisted or bent, not more than last time anyway
6. ( vertebral body) sticks out at the back which it shouldnt
7.the known retropulsed bone identified on CT/MRI. = another bit of bone out the back, which again is part of the injury and shouldnt be there - but if it werent there, it wouldnt be a fracture
8.Mild anterior wedging of T12 vertebrae is noted.=
T12 is twelfth thoracic vertebra. Side view is square ( most of the time) This one is squeeshed down at the front ( anterior, nowhere near the spinal cord) - So it looks like a filled quitcase before you have buckled it down.
Salut ( no that is the final sentence)
and all from Readers Digest - as Sqad observed, I did O level biology once
there is no charge for this ( actually I am not sure if I can charge if I am not MB BS)