Yes, I watched it and was horrified at some aspects. I believe that no-one should be named until they are charged, famous or not. There would be plenty of time for other accusers to come forward before trial. For Paul Gambaccini to be on bail for over 15 months was dreadful, how long would it take to find his accuser was a serial accuser and mentally ill as well? I also felt that the ex editor of the Sun and the chap with the double barrelled surname enjoyed their parts in it all far too much. Ok, a few of the accused were found guilty and locked up but far more didn't have a case to answer, after all that anguish. The business with Cliff's apartment being raided and the media being tipped off was criminal. It's true in this country we put people up there and then enjoy knocking them off and it shouldn't be a part of being famous. It would be a sad world if we had no-one entertaining us in any way, no singers, no music, no dancers, no drama because they were scared of being falslely accused but worse, hung out to dry by the media and the media's iffy followers.