Today I Heard My First . . . . .
ChatterBank2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by 4getmenot. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The BBC seems to be making a habit of over-estimating the appeal of certain individuals - the most recent being Graham Norton - a celebrity with no home to go to.
Davina has been perceived as 'cutting edge' because her peculiar shouty style suits the few minutes before Big Brother starts, and the interviewing of 'stars' within that format.
What the viewing public have realised - and eventually the BBC will have to swallow its pride and write off the budget for this show - is that playing stooge to 'stars' puffing their latest book / film / record is not rocket science, but it does require considerably more skill to appear natural and unforced, than Davina possesses.
Her nerves translate as either brittle forced questioning, or overly gushing laughter, neither of which endear her to a viewing audience who will soon be able to watch Parkinson doing the same thing far better on ITV.
These days a 'chat show' consists of feeding banal questions to 'celebrities' with something to sell, or acting as a stooge, feeding lines to a tired past-it comedian who is phoning in their routine from the seat opposite. Parky may be well past his sell-by date, but even on auto-pilot his experience and reputation still leave him streets ahead of the likes of Davina, who cannot even be considered as 'competition'.
Any bets on a second series - or even lasting to the end of the run on this one?
the Beeb may be forced to let it run to the end, because they've talked up so much about being "100% behind Davina ...." but there's no way she'll be back if she limps to the end of this run.
What bothers me is, I, and millions of other people could have told the BBC that she wouldn't be any good - why do they pay six-figure salaries to Commissioning Editors who can't see what's staring them in the face?