Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
So its not only pies that he is in love with
2 jags now has been caught with his pants down. Affair with secretary since 2002, trysts at a secret flat......and he is the deputy PM. Shameless and morally corrupt this whole labour govt has been....top to bottom.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Dom Tuk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
JNO
stop hijacking this thread, you may post if you have opinions on the matter. Besides i may add that touching was not what he was doing and he certainly was not setting up his diary in a second home that you and i have paid for.
I wonder what prompted him to bury this news on the day that Charles Clarke was in trouble. Did some newspaper or the mistress threaten to do the dirty on him?
.................and yet still people doggedly (and incorrectly) feel that this Government is less sleazy than the last Tory Government. Blinkered naivety.
However - I am of the firm opinion that as long as it doesn't interfere with their ability to do their job (obviously in Prescott's case this is difficult to judge as he does naff all anyway) and it is not illegal, then they can pretty much do what the hell they like: if they fancy playing away from home or, if they are not married/in a relationship, indulge in an affair with a married woman (Blunkett), then I don't think it has got anything to do with us.
For anyone in a position of extensive power and authority, who are paid by us, the plebs, copious amounts of money each year there is an unwritten tag included which should state that he or she should be able to behave appropriately.
When you are in a high position and accountable publically for your behaviour, you should make sure that you are without fault as much as is possible. A one off fling could be a mistake; a two year affair is, frankly, just naughty.
The government should be the standard the country can follow; the example to us all, but it never is as they do sometimes behave as though they view themselves to be above the law or the moral code or conduct.
I'm all for forgivness and knowing that we all do wrong sometimes and that none of us are perfect; however, when you are making the rules, when you are supposed to be the yardstick, you are judged more harshly.
I don't know about education, education, education; more like years of corruption, corruption, corruption.
When you are in a high position and accountable publically for your behaviour, you should make sure that you are without fault as much as is possible. A one off fling could be a mistake; a two year affair is, frankly, just naughty.
The government should be the standard the country can follow; the example to us all, but it never is as they do sometimes behave as though they view themselves to be above the law or the moral code or conduct.
I'm all for forgivness and knowing that we all do wrong sometimes and that none of us are perfect; however, when you are making the rules, when you are supposed to be the yardstick, you are judged more harshly.
I don't know about education, education, education; more like years of corruption, corruption, corruption.
disagree strongly with mimififi. MPs are not elected to be moral exemplars - that's what archbishops are for. Those who insist we should all be morally pure (as the Tories did - for a while) can expect some stick if they turn out not to be that way themselves. Labour have never told us how to conduct our sex lives, and in return we needn't waste our time telling them how to conduct theirs. Criticise them for the way they run the country, not the way they run their private lives.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.