I've been saying this for a few days now. I don't condone for a second what Brand and Ross did and have no sympathy for them, but apparently, the number of people who a) heard the broadcast at the time and b) complained about it at the time was very small. The rest of the 35,000 and counting must therefore fall into one of three categories:
1. Those who heard the broadcast when it was made but didn't complain about it until the media got all hot under the collar. They then decided to follow like the dutiful, mindless nodding donkeys they are.
2. Those who didn't hear it at the time, but are so in love with the idea of being offended at something - anything - that they sought it out on YouTube or podcast, so they could understand what it was they were supposed to get so upset about.
3. Those who still haven't heard it, but are sure that it must have been really awful, because that nice Melanie Phillips said so, and it's not as if she's a razor-toothed, knee-jerk reactionary, bile-spewing, right-wing, hate-filled, gutter press harridan hack or anything, is it?
For all Ross and Brand's (and Lesley Douglas') gross errors of judgement (and I'll repeat for the benefit of the sabre-rattlers, I have no sympathy for any of them), there is something wrong when the morals of large numbers of people in this country are determined by the rancid twitterings of some sensationalist so-called "journalist". Still, I suppose "important" news like this will stop them having to think about "trivial" matters like impending genocide in the Congo.