Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have noticed that the Judge did not dismiss the Jury, after Helen came out with rape accusation on Tuesday night. If another witness comes forward,
ie Jess, with the same story, then Helen's case couldn't look better than it does now.
Lets hope she and he brief can keep the momentum up for the rest of the trial.
ie Jess, with the same story, then Helen's case couldn't look better than it does now.
Lets hope she and he brief can keep the momentum up for the rest of the trial.
So where is Ambridge......get a grip
I listen to most of the summary Sunday sessions - it's a delightful look at what folk consider to be current rural (Britain) England and nothing more....
How far did Nigel plummet to his death off the church roof? Higher than Truro Cathedral, mikey....even allowing for some literary interpretation, a little OTT, as this court case will be. Just accept it though - and move on.
I listen to most of the summary Sunday sessions - it's a delightful look at what folk consider to be current rural (Britain) England and nothing more....
How far did Nigel plummet to his death off the church roof? Higher than Truro Cathedral, mikey....even allowing for some literary interpretation, a little OTT, as this court case will be. Just accept it though - and move on.
Prudie...there is no evidence that he blocked the culvert, unless Anna can persuade the Polish worker to materialise. An accusation without proof would just play into the prosecutors hand. But even if she could produce the chap, it would be his word against Rob. And it wouldn't really help prove that Helen acted in self-defence.
Shula's evidence would probably be ruled out by the Judge, as Anna has already made clear.
No.........the only way for Helen to be found not guilty here is for her to destroy Rob's credibility and his story. If Jess appears tomorrow and says that she was raped as well, then it will look good for Helen.
Helen must win over the Jury and a self-defence stand would seem to be the best way forward.
What I am hoping for is that Rob loses his temper under cross-examination.
We all know that he has a very short fuse and Anna should be able to get him to lose it.
Rob is very clever but, like all clever people, he is also very arrogant.
He thinks he is invincible but if he is given enough rope, he will surely hang himself with it.
Shula's evidence would probably be ruled out by the Judge, as Anna has already made clear.
No.........the only way for Helen to be found not guilty here is for her to destroy Rob's credibility and his story. If Jess appears tomorrow and says that she was raped as well, then it will look good for Helen.
Helen must win over the Jury and a self-defence stand would seem to be the best way forward.
What I am hoping for is that Rob loses his temper under cross-examination.
We all know that he has a very short fuse and Anna should be able to get him to lose it.
Rob is very clever but, like all clever people, he is also very arrogant.
He thinks he is invincible but if he is given enough rope, he will surely hang himself with it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.