News6 mins ago
Can You Believe This, Jeremy Vine Is Accused Of 'racially Stereotyping'?
37 Answers
http://
/// Asked about the gun sign, Mr O'Keeffe accused Mr Vine of racial stereotyping the defendant because she is black. ///
/// He said: 'I suggest to you that you have racially stereotyped her as a black person and that gesture is associated with black people.' ///
/// Asked about the gun sign, Mr O'Keeffe accused Mr Vine of racial stereotyping the defendant because she is black. ///
/// He said: 'I suggest to you that you have racially stereotyped her as a black person and that gesture is associated with black people.' ///
Answers
I couldn't give a gnats chuff what colour or race this 'orrible woman. She is not in Court for being black....she is there before she behaved like a dangerously spoilt brat. I am guessing that her Brief knows that the case is hopeless, as its all on film, so he/she is just tring the race card as a last attempt, and I hope the Judge castigates her for so doing.
14:39 Sat 14th Jan 2017
Of course I can believe it.
A defence counsel is paid to provide anything and everything that will defend his client, and this is merely an example of that.
The counsel is going to suggest - note that he carefully uses legal lkangauge, not accusing Mr Vine of stereotyping - such an offence because it can then be heard in the court. It doesn't matter if he pursues the claim or not - the statement has been heard by the judge, and the defence counsel hopes that does its job - presenting a negative image of Mr Vine.
It's little difficult to argue that the gesture was not made, since it appears on the photograph in the link, but as I say, the point is merely to provide a negative image of Mr Vine, which is the counsel's job so to do.
A defence counsel is paid to provide anything and everything that will defend his client, and this is merely an example of that.
The counsel is going to suggest - note that he carefully uses legal lkangauge, not accusing Mr Vine of stereotyping - such an offence because it can then be heard in the court. It doesn't matter if he pursues the claim or not - the statement has been heard by the judge, and the defence counsel hopes that does its job - presenting a negative image of Mr Vine.
It's little difficult to argue that the gesture was not made, since it appears on the photograph in the link, but as I say, the point is merely to provide a negative image of Mr Vine, which is the counsel's job so to do.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.