Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Hancock/Boris/Cummings
33 Answers
How on earth can Hancock survive after Cummings produces emails from Boris calling Hancock XXX-useless?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Because this will be seen for what it is - yesterday's man trying to stay 'in touch' by being a bigger idiot than he has been already - which is some feat - and it will all die down in a day or so.
Cummings has no credibility whatsoever, no-one is interested in his petty spiteful stirring, it's time he returned to the obscurity he so richly deserves.
Cummings has no credibility whatsoever, no-one is interested in his petty spiteful stirring, it's time he returned to the obscurity he so richly deserves.
YMB - // REally AH?
I suspect many will be lapping this up to use in the forthcoming political struggle. //
Yes really.
I am sure that there are things that can be used to batter Boris with in the future, but the spiteful whiney posturing of a former advisor with an axe to grind, and zero credibility behind him, is never going to be one of them.
I suspect many will be lapping this up to use in the forthcoming political struggle. //
Yes really.
I am sure that there are things that can be used to batter Boris with in the future, but the spiteful whiney posturing of a former advisor with an axe to grind, and zero credibility behind him, is never going to be one of them.
Cummings’ accusation was that he sent elderly people back to care homes which had no testing and no PPE. 50,000 died.
That is pretty serious. If true not only should he lose his job, he should’ve barred for life.
Cummings disclosure merely confirms that everyone in Downing Street thought Hancock not up to the job.
The reason Johnson has not sacked Hancock is that he needs someone to sack in the future when an inquiry says the Government cocked up.
That is pretty serious. If true not only should he lose his job, he should’ve barred for life.
Cummings disclosure merely confirms that everyone in Downing Street thought Hancock not up to the job.
The reason Johnson has not sacked Hancock is that he needs someone to sack in the future when an inquiry says the Government cocked up.
Boris won’t sack Hancock because he needs someone to sack once the enquiry concludes.
Also to the point that no-one’s interested in the story…3.193 comments in the Mail alone.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-9 692327/ Dominic -Cummin gs-post s-bombs hell-Wh atsApp- message -Boris- Johnson .html#c omments
Also to the point that no-one’s interested in the story…3.193 comments in the Mail alone.
https:/