1.000 Migrants Since Christmas Day
News1 min ago
My sad prediction for Charley
9 Answers
Okay, let's see if I am right or not!
Even though she is a despicable person and wholly does not deserve any money or fame out of Big Brother, I believe she will end up being a star. And the reason for this? She is thin. Sad but true. We buy millions of magazines every week to gawp at models and actresses who have what we wish we could be- skinniness. Laura, for example, got hardly any screen time, and nobody wants to read about her or look at pictures of her. Why? Because she is normal. she looks like me and you. Charley will photograph well and we will have a fascination with her. She may not get to go on talk shows, as let's face it, she has everything yet nothing to say. But I reckon she will end up loaded from this. Where is the justice?
All I can suggest is- boycott magazines that she is on and in. Vote with your feet. If you buy these mags, she will be booked to be in them time and time again, and we will be making her rich for basically being a bully and a cow. Same thing happened with Jade Goody- we are STILL buying magazines with her in, although thankfully a lot less after her stint on celebrity BB.
Charley is a nasty person. We know that. So don't honour her nastiness by buying into it!! Who disagrees?
Even though she is a despicable person and wholly does not deserve any money or fame out of Big Brother, I believe she will end up being a star. And the reason for this? She is thin. Sad but true. We buy millions of magazines every week to gawp at models and actresses who have what we wish we could be- skinniness. Laura, for example, got hardly any screen time, and nobody wants to read about her or look at pictures of her. Why? Because she is normal. she looks like me and you. Charley will photograph well and we will have a fascination with her. She may not get to go on talk shows, as let's face it, she has everything yet nothing to say. But I reckon she will end up loaded from this. Where is the justice?
All I can suggest is- boycott magazines that she is on and in. Vote with your feet. If you buy these mags, she will be booked to be in them time and time again, and we will be making her rich for basically being a bully and a cow. Same thing happened with Jade Goody- we are STILL buying magazines with her in, although thankfully a lot less after her stint on celebrity BB.
Charley is a nasty person. We know that. So don't honour her nastiness by buying into it!! Who disagrees?
Answers
1 to 9 of 9
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Scarlett. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm not going to not buy a mag because she is in it, becaUSE THAT WOULD MEAN NO MAGS FOR ME for the next month after BB. yer she is thin but she has a face you'd like to ounch. She will be one of those people that people love to hate and well if people are silly enough to buy her book good on her. She is nasty but alot of others are in that house and its tv who knows what they cut. We all know they've been a bit sly about keeping her in as it is. The same people that want her out will be the same people that will be bored next week and want her back in like Nicky last year
What will happen to Charley is what will happen to all BB people - popular or not - they fade away like ripples in a pond.
The only way BB people become 'known' - which is a more accurate adjective than 'famous' is because they are in people's front rooms for a four-month period as part of a designated programme format. Take away the format, the interest in the individual evaporates.
The BBC learned this with Davina McCall - it isn't her that is the appeal of BB, it is the show that follows her bellowed nonsense. You could have Tony Benn fronting it, it would still get viewers. Take Davina out of the environment, and imagine she is a chat-show host - disaster.
It is the show, not the people, always has been, always will be.
The only way BB people become 'known' - which is a more accurate adjective than 'famous' is because they are in people's front rooms for a four-month period as part of a designated programme format. Take away the format, the interest in the individual evaporates.
The BBC learned this with Davina McCall - it isn't her that is the appeal of BB, it is the show that follows her bellowed nonsense. You could have Tony Benn fronting it, it would still get viewers. Take Davina out of the environment, and imagine she is a chat-show host - disaster.
It is the show, not the people, always has been, always will be.
-- answer removed --
1 to 9 of 9
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.