ChatterBank0 min ago
The Man Who Ate Himself To Death ...........
Just watched this programme on Channel 5, a 36 year old man, Ricky, on the island of Guam weighed 65 stone and despite valiant attempts by doctors and specialists, he just couldn't lose weight. His poor wife Cheryl was torn by the loyalty to her husband and giving in to his demands for fattening food and the help he so desperately needed. What a sad sad story, he died last November. Anyone else see it? Its on Channel 5 + 1 at the moment you will have missed the first 10 mins or so, or watch on catch up.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ann. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I just watched it. His wife was the only one who could have saved him. He put on another 50% of his body weight after they married. She also went round on camera buying deep fried bananas coated in batter and sugar, and sticks of greasy meat. Then when it all got too much she left him. Then she didn't go to his memorial service. Sorry to say it but she was his undoing.
I think his wife was quite scared of him and had to give in to his demands of food. But surely he couldn't do much to her if she disobeyed his demands for food, he could hardly get up off the bed! What a state to get in, just for food and sad that he couldn't change his mind set. Did he actually take an overdose in front of his wife then, couldn't quite work that one out.
No I didn't watch it.
Re the sympathy thing. On one level one can say he didn't stop eating so one has no sympathy. But on another level doesn't that indicate that even with the threat of death he couldn't stop himself craving that which would kill him ? Isn't that something to be sympathetic about ?
I'm unsure folk are anything like under control of their actions as society has to believe they are. That, as indicated in the Guam guy's case, we are all putting up with whatever the mind forces us to cope with. And that leads on to major philosophical questions about what "we" really are. It seems the conscious part that thinks it is in control is just one small part, and sometimes gets reminded of it's lack of power.
Re the sympathy thing. On one level one can say he didn't stop eating so one has no sympathy. But on another level doesn't that indicate that even with the threat of death he couldn't stop himself craving that which would kill him ? Isn't that something to be sympathetic about ?
I'm unsure folk are anything like under control of their actions as society has to believe they are. That, as indicated in the Guam guy's case, we are all putting up with whatever the mind forces us to cope with. And that leads on to major philosophical questions about what "we" really are. It seems the conscious part that thinks it is in control is just one small part, and sometimes gets reminded of it's lack of power.
-- answer removed --
There were a lot of unanswered questions arising from this - as someone else said who looked after Ricky in the short time that Cheryl left him before she went back? Did he warn her he would take an overdose if she left him again? At the funeral it didn't look as if Ricky was in a coffin, just covered with a cloth in the church? How did they get him there, it must have been a very undignified and sad thing to get his body out of the house. Was he buried or cremated? I am torn between sympathy and shock that nobody helped him but kept saying they would only help if he lost 100 lbs first. Wonder what has happened to his wife Cheryl?
If you missed the programme, watch it here
http:// www.cha nnel5.c om/show s/the-m an-who- ate-him self-to -death/ episode s/the-m an-who- ate-him self-to -death
http://