T W A U ... The Chase....today's...
Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Katie Hopkins Speaks Out....
46 Answers
Once more goes into territory others fear to dread!
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
from the article
// Katie Hopkins, ever the self-publicist, has done it again.//
but here is AbuBakr the first kalieefa ( successor to Mohd pbuh)
In the early 7th century, the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, whilst instructing his Muslim army, laid down the following rules concerning warfare:
Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone.[5][6]
and that kinda sez different
altho I agree not as awfui lot of this is happening in Syria ( peace be on its head but extremely extremely unlikely )
// Katie Hopkins, ever the self-publicist, has done it again.//
but here is AbuBakr the first kalieefa ( successor to Mohd pbuh)
In the early 7th century, the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, whilst instructing his Muslim army, laid down the following rules concerning warfare:
Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy's flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone.[5][6]
and that kinda sez different
altho I agree not as awfui lot of this is happening in Syria ( peace be on its head but extremely extremely unlikely )
This is complex. Islamic literature gives Muslim men permission to take women of the enemy and use them as they will. Although most Muslims don’t act upon that direction, due to verses that instruct Muslims to repel the infidel many regard all non-Muslims as the enemy. Hence, even though no physical war may be waging, all infidels are considered to be enemies of Islam – so in that respect, Katie Hopkins is right – although it doesn’t just apply to white women. It applies to all non-Muslim women.
can't find a link but I recall recently an Imam pronouncing that women who dress provocatively (ie don't wear a burkha) are fair game and deserve anything they subsequently receive. in a particular case, he said something like...
"if she had been in her kitchen, in her burkha, this would not have happened".
"if she had been in her kitchen, in her burkha, this would not have happened".
Katie Hopkins is an intelligent woman, there is no doubt about that.
She has created a lucrative career out of the media equivalent of finding a small fire and chucking a large bucket of petrol on it.
But the fact is, Ms. Hopkins is - as been pointed out by my learned friend SP1814, she is a commentator, and we should not give credence to her views that is not actually merited.
So she will have an audience, a potentially large audience for her unpleasant, inaccurate and inflammatory views, but 'views' is all they are - let's keep that in mind.
She has created a lucrative career out of the media equivalent of finding a small fire and chucking a large bucket of petrol on it.
But the fact is, Ms. Hopkins is - as been pointed out by my learned friend SP1814, she is a commentator, and we should not give credence to her views that is not actually merited.
So she will have an audience, a potentially large audience for her unpleasant, inaccurate and inflammatory views, but 'views' is all they are - let's keep that in mind.
Naomi - //andy-hughes, //….as been pointed out by my learned friend SP1814//
‘Learned’? Why? //
It was a tongue-in-cheek reference - as used between barristers in the courtesies of legal address.
//…we should not give credence to her views that is not actually merited.//
In this instance her views are merited. //
I don't think Katie Hopkins' views on what colour underwear she has chosen to wear today are merited - much less her views on something as potentially inflammatory as this typically ill-informed and provocative guff that is her stock-in-trade - are merited, so perhaps we can agree to disagree on this occasion.
‘Learned’? Why? //
It was a tongue-in-cheek reference - as used between barristers in the courtesies of legal address.
//…we should not give credence to her views that is not actually merited.//
In this instance her views are merited. //
I don't think Katie Hopkins' views on what colour underwear she has chosen to wear today are merited - much less her views on something as potentially inflammatory as this typically ill-informed and provocative guff that is her stock-in-trade - are merited, so perhaps we can agree to disagree on this occasion.
