Jokes4 mins ago
Bereavement Damages
10 Answers
My father passed away two years ago and I have recently received a copy of his final account. I note from it that there is a bereavement damages payment made to his estranged wife in the sum of £12,900 via Irwin Mitchell regarding a claim my father made before his passing relating to asbestos in his previous job. My question is how can the wife be entitled to anything if they had separated several years before his death?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by francesca01. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The exact wording of the will is of great importance in a case like this. If, say, it ended with "the residue of my my estate I give in its entirety to Fred Bloggs" then (assuming that the will didn't say anything specific about who should receive the asbestos-related payment) I would have expected Fred to get the sum in question.
However if the will only said "I give my car to Hilda Smith, my house to Tom Price and everything in my bank account at the time of my death to Fred Bloggs" then there's no instruction in the will which covers the relevant payment. In which case a 'partial intestacy' is created, meaning that the payment (and anything else not covered under the terms of the will) is dealt with as if your father died without leaving a will. (That would explain why it passed to his estranged wife).
You need to examine the exact wording of the will carefully, to find out which part of it would have included the asbestos-related payment. If you can find such a term then it seems possible that the estate has been wrongly distributed. However if there's no such term it would seem that everything is (legally) in order, even if it's not what your father would have wanted.
However if the will only said "I give my car to Hilda Smith, my house to Tom Price and everything in my bank account at the time of my death to Fred Bloggs" then there's no instruction in the will which covers the relevant payment. In which case a 'partial intestacy' is created, meaning that the payment (and anything else not covered under the terms of the will) is dealt with as if your father died without leaving a will. (That would explain why it passed to his estranged wife).
You need to examine the exact wording of the will carefully, to find out which part of it would have included the asbestos-related payment. If you can find such a term then it seems possible that the estate has been wrongly distributed. However if there's no such term it would seem that everything is (legally) in order, even if it's not what your father would have wanted.
bit here now we know what they are
https:/ /www.pe nningto ns.co.u k/news- publica tions/l atest-n ews/201 8/berea vement- damages -court- ruling- marks-a -step-i n-the-r ight-di rection -for-un married -couple s/
I thought they werent claimable - so it is lucky I dont practise in Law
https:/
I thought they werent claimable - so it is lucky I dont practise in Law
I have looked at the wording of the will and there is no mention of his estranged wife or indeed the asbestos claim, the latter was not settled until after his death so I presume that’s why there’s no mention.
On the final account it states:
In:
Asbestos claim: £xxxxx (Irwin Mitchell)
Out:
Bereavement damages payable to Mrs xxxxx
£xxxxx (Irwin Mitchell)
This person left him after thirty years of marriage, they were separated for about three years and she only crawled out of the woodwork when she heard he had terminal cancer relating to his previous employment and had made a claim against them.
If it’s all legal of course I’ll accept that but it does seem a bit strange that she can receive “bereavement damages” when they were estranged and going through a divorce.
On the final account it states:
In:
Asbestos claim: £xxxxx (Irwin Mitchell)
Out:
Bereavement damages payable to Mrs xxxxx
£xxxxx (Irwin Mitchell)
This person left him after thirty years of marriage, they were separated for about three years and she only crawled out of the woodwork when she heard he had terminal cancer relating to his previous employment and had made a claim against them.
If it’s all legal of course I’ll accept that but it does seem a bit strange that she can receive “bereavement damages” when they were estranged and going through a divorce.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.