Crosswords2 mins ago
Richard and Judy
Can anyone explain why its ok to have Bill Wyman on but not Gary Glitter?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ric.ror. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
has anyone actually said GG is not allowed on...mmmm?
bill wyman married mandy smith.
she looked and behaved like an adult woman - that is why he fancied her - because he fancies women, not children.
GG likes prepubescent boys and girls that look like children and he abused many of them.
gg is a paedophile, bill wyman is not.
paedophile means someone who is unnaturally sexually attracted to prepubescent children.
mandy s was 14-15 and was physically an adult.
there is a difference here
bill wyman married mandy smith.
she looked and behaved like an adult woman - that is why he fancied her - because he fancies women, not children.
GG likes prepubescent boys and girls that look like children and he abused many of them.
gg is a paedophile, bill wyman is not.
paedophile means someone who is unnaturally sexually attracted to prepubescent children.
mandy s was 14-15 and was physically an adult.
there is a difference here
I agree with joko:
''paedophile means someone who is unnaturally sexually attracted to prepubescent children''.
kempie, I am not au fait with the sex offenders register..I know it was introduced in 1997 ~ I just wondered, have people who offended befoe this date been put on the register?
I remember the furore at the time..both the relationship details comig out in the press and the wedding 6 years later. I have to admit looking at Mandy Smith at 13 years old you would have thought she was much older.
Like a lot of those so called 'Wild Childs' of the era she was visiting nightclubs at a very young age...you have to wonder what on earth their parents were thinking.
''paedophile means someone who is unnaturally sexually attracted to prepubescent children''.
kempie, I am not au fait with the sex offenders register..I know it was introduced in 1997 ~ I just wondered, have people who offended befoe this date been put on the register?
I remember the furore at the time..both the relationship details comig out in the press and the wedding 6 years later. I have to admit looking at Mandy Smith at 13 years old you would have thought she was much older.
Like a lot of those so called 'Wild Childs' of the era she was visiting nightclubs at a very young age...you have to wonder what on earth their parents were thinking.
I wasn't saying that, Ric.ror.
By commenting on her appearance and streetwise personality I was pointing out the difference between sex with a minor and paedophilia. There is a difference, and as we are comparing Bill Wyman to Gary Glitter this needs pointing out.
I also was not trying to say I was condoning Wymans actions ~ just that there is a difference between being attracted to children rather than being attracted to a 13 year old who looks 18.
By commenting on her appearance and streetwise personality I was pointing out the difference between sex with a minor and paedophilia. There is a difference, and as we are comparing Bill Wyman to Gary Glitter this needs pointing out.
I also was not trying to say I was condoning Wymans actions ~ just that there is a difference between being attracted to children rather than being attracted to a 13 year old who looks 18.
Placement on the Sex Offenders Register is not retrospective. My point was hypothetical - Wyman was never charged for his offences.
To be fair nobody explicity brought up the issue of paedophilia until after my post with the link. Up 'til that point I had never considered it as part of the comparison between the two men who broke laws in regard of sexual conduct.
I'm also quite disturbed by the double standard which is evident within this thread and prevalent in society as a whole. Ignoring the two specific cases above, it seems that a paedophile may never do more than look at pictures but is instantly labelled as the worst type of sexual predator and yet a girl as much as 4 years away from legally consenting to sexual intercourse may be fair game to a man of any age as long as she looks the part.
The irony of the Smith/Wyman affair is that he dumped her on her 16th birthday.
To be fair nobody explicity brought up the issue of paedophilia until after my post with the link. Up 'til that point I had never considered it as part of the comparison between the two men who broke laws in regard of sexual conduct.
I'm also quite disturbed by the double standard which is evident within this thread and prevalent in society as a whole. Ignoring the two specific cases above, it seems that a paedophile may never do more than look at pictures but is instantly labelled as the worst type of sexual predator and yet a girl as much as 4 years away from legally consenting to sexual intercourse may be fair game to a man of any age as long as she looks the part.
The irony of the Smith/Wyman affair is that he dumped her on her 16th birthday.
Did he ~ was that before he married her when she was 19?
I can't see a double standard within the thread, only posts confirming the legal differences between sex with a minor and paedophilia.
And we still have to remember that Wyman has not been convicted of sex with a minor, a lot of which has to do with the fact that it was never proved that he had actually had sex with Mandy before her 16th birthday..they had simply *dated*. Rightly or wrongly, that is all we have to go on.
Gary Glitter on the other hand...
I can't see a double standard within the thread, only posts confirming the legal differences between sex with a minor and paedophilia.
And we still have to remember that Wyman has not been convicted of sex with a minor, a lot of which has to do with the fact that it was never proved that he had actually had sex with Mandy before her 16th birthday..they had simply *dated*. Rightly or wrongly, that is all we have to go on.
Gary Glitter on the other hand...
Yes Kempie because as we all know 'if they are old enough to bleed' etc. I find it disturbing that any middle age man would wish to have a relationship with any 14+ year old girl and I do not care how 'mature' she seems. It would seem that some of these children - and yes I think they are children - are looking for a father figure and any man should know better. It also opens a debate about a middle age man having an affair with a 16 year old BOY.
Two weeks after Wyman dumped Smith on her 16th birthday the affair became headline news (coincidence?) leading to Wyman's two month self imposed exile in France to avoid possible charges (the actions of an innocent man?). There was never any prosecution presumably because the case would have been far easier to try if Smith was still a minor (what evidence would still exist?)
They met up again 2� years later in March '89. Three weeks on they decided to marry and did so after a further two months.
BTW there are 2 posts which offer tacit approval to the underage relationship.
They met up again 2� years later in March '89. Three weeks on they decided to marry and did so after a further two months.
BTW there are 2 posts which offer tacit approval to the underage relationship.
