Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Monaco Grand prix...
How jammy was Vettel eh? red flag when his tyres where dead! Can anyone explain the reasoning why the teams can work on the cars when they are parked awaiting restart? Including changing tyres which basically gave the race to Vettel. Alonso would probalbly have won had there not been a crash both he and Hamilton would almost certainly have passed Vettel as his tyres where dropping off a cliff.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I agree Geezer - it always seems to work out for Red Bull even when they c@ck this up - like putting the wrong tyres on Vettel's car .
I hope we are not going to see a future domination of the races by Red Bull , akin to the Ferrari / Shumacher era
Do you think that Hamilton has a point ? - I know it's not a contact sport , but if drivers are going to attempt a pass , especially at Monaco - it follows that there may be contact .
In my opinion it was just a racing incident , between two drivers - i dont see how Hamilton was more to blame than Massa
I hope we are not going to see a future domination of the races by Red Bull , akin to the Ferrari / Shumacher era
Do you think that Hamilton has a point ? - I know it's not a contact sport , but if drivers are going to attempt a pass , especially at Monaco - it follows that there may be contact .
In my opinion it was just a racing incident , between two drivers - i dont see how Hamilton was more to blame than Massa
Monaco has always offered few opportunities for over-taking however, the processional races of the past few years are a poor reflection of they hey-day of the Grands Prix. It's a shame that some of the more competitive drivers are penalised for trying to make the race interesting, for them and the spectators.
Geezer - It's called 'Motor-Racing' not 'condition-of-the-tyres'.......and please watch your tone.
Geezer - It's called 'Motor-Racing' not 'condition-of-the-tyres'.......and please watch your tone.
The tyres are an important factor in the strategy. More so this year with Pirelli replacing Bridgestone with clear direction given to the teams on wear and tear.
It's not just about the driving. If all the tyres never wore out and all had the same stickiness then I'd agree but they don't, there is also the factor of how the different drivers are able to get more out of them. I'll watch my tone when you stop talking cobblers ok?
It's not just about the driving. If all the tyres never wore out and all had the same stickiness then I'd agree but they don't, there is also the factor of how the different drivers are able to get more out of them. I'll watch my tone when you stop talking cobblers ok?
Although it pains me to say it, I agree with R1 on this particular point ;-)
And re Hamilton... he deserves what he got. Trying to pass on that particular hairpin, being fully aware of the limitations of the car (steering lock limits) was just stupid... although his subsequent overtake of Massa in the tunnel was impressive...
And re Hamilton... he deserves what he got. Trying to pass on that particular hairpin, being fully aware of the limitations of the car (steering lock limits) was just stupid... although his subsequent overtake of Massa in the tunnel was impressive...
R1 - Pointing out that tinkering around the edges of the Grands Prix to the extent that the condition of the tyres is a 'critical' issue now of race strategy...is NOT talking cobblers.
Perhaps if you took your head out of your fundamental orifice for long enough to understand what people were actually saying, before shooting your mouth off, you wouldn't spend so much of your time in the AnswerBank sin-bin ?
Perhaps if you took your head out of your fundamental orifice for long enough to understand what people were actually saying, before shooting your mouth off, you wouldn't spend so much of your time in the AnswerBank sin-bin ?
well this is what you said JTH:
"I'm not sure how much 'sport' is involved when the result can come down to 'Whose tyres are least worst ?"...... "
how did I mis interpret this pearl of wisdom?
Red Bull left Vettel out, he'd done 65 laps of tyres where they had been told they where only good for 45, they where about to go, that would have effected the result. The "sport" here is that Red Bull messed up the strategy and were saved by events.
"I'm not sure how much 'sport' is involved when the result can come down to 'Whose tyres are least worst ?"...... "
how did I mis interpret this pearl of wisdom?
Red Bull left Vettel out, he'd done 65 laps of tyres where they had been told they where only good for 45, they where about to go, that would have effected the result. The "sport" here is that Red Bull messed up the strategy and were saved by events.
It's not so much a sport when the man in the car is at the mercy of a chap in a short-sleeved shirt making in/correct decisions about the performance of the tyres......
It used to be significantly more about the chap holding the steering-wheel in his hand.
I hope that is simple enough for even you to understand, now, geezer ?
It used to be significantly more about the chap holding the steering-wheel in his hand.
I hope that is simple enough for even you to understand, now, geezer ?