Can anyone say whether it is possible to 'disclose' without the insurer misconstruing the communication as a claim?
Put differently;
i) Vehicle contact occurred
ii) Damage is less than the excess, so not worth the insured making a claim
Obvious problems with this approach:
1) Other vehicle registration not identified
2) Driver details not exchanged - possible violation of policy terms and conditions.
3) Lack of handbrake while stationary & attention distracted by something other than traffic ahead or in mirrors could be taken to mean 'not in full control of vehicle' and/or due care and attention. Such admissions is guaranteed to up your premium, or make them drop you entirely.
So, disclose and have it cost you permanently higher premium or don't disclose and have them refuse to pay out when they find out because the other driver got your reg and claims? Heads they win… tails you lose.
Insurers expect customers to claim asap, so if a week or two have gone by, with no contact, it's unlikely the other driver claimed.