The Oven Is One Place To Find This
Food & Drink1 min ago
I would be grateful for the collective wisdom-there is no right answer. Both are 12 years old and one is going to be replaced by a small hatchback . The Volvo is very smooth on the road , the FL2 is better on a rough farm track . Both are encountered on a daily basis. I prefer the FL2 BUT it has been disappointingly expensive to maintain - having needed a new thermostat assembly , power transfer unit , some suspension bits and a new handbrake assembly . The Volvo hasn't needed anything other than routine maintenance . The dilemma is whether the Volvo is about to need a lot doing while the FL2 will need nothing doing from now or if the Volvo is just very reliable and the FL2 will continue to be a moneypit. Thoughts, please.
No best answer has yet been selected by barnaclebill58. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The XC90 is on demand 4WD and plenty use them to pull horse trailers off road -but the tracking (which I count as routine maintenance) does need doing twice a year as hitting hard bumps seems to throw it out -whereas the FL2 seems bombproof in that respect. I like Douglas' answer -just go a bit slower and don't hit bumps hard.
XC90 isn't the easiest to park in town and can be nightmare in multistoreys built when cars were much smaller but it can carry a lot in 5 seat mode and even more with the seats folded down.
Hmm -leaning towards keeping the XC90.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.