Scottish Field Error In Big 2024...
Crosswords1 min ago
Insurers will use any excuse they can dream up, not to pay a claim – this is getting ridiculous.
I recall they tried claiming fitting a roof-rack was a modification that invalidated the insurance.
One of the vehicles I owned had a tow bar fitted; I thought its most useful feature was that if someone was to rear-end me at low speed, the only damage would be that inflicted on their vehicle by the tow bar.
If I was the Financial Ombudsman I would have been asking how having a tow bar fitted increases the insurance risk.
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your link shows a driver referred an insurer's decision not to pay out, to the Ombudsman and the Ombudsman agreed with the insurers.
"The driver who got in touch with us told us that he is at his 'wits end' adding that, following a routine vehicle collision, his insurer had refused to honour his insurance at the last minute, leaving him with a potential six-figure cost and incredible stress and anxiety for him and his family,' Rosamond said."
"Following a nine-month dispute with Flow - a subsidiary of Allianz - the Financial Ombudsman Service found in favour of the insurance company."
"If I was the Financial Ombudsman I would have been asking how having a tow bar fitted increases the insurance risk."
And that's exactly what the Ombudsman asks. There must be a clear link between the modification and additional risk before liability can be denied.
Here's an example from the Ombudsman where an insurer tried to deny a claim because of a changed air filter:
https:/
The Ombudsman actually goes further than that in some cases and insists that the modification actually contributed to the accident before cover is denied..
I tell my car insurer everything, that way they can't refuse to pay out.
I tell them about my hardwired dashcam (nearly invisible from outside the vehicle) and the after market reversing sensors.
Ridiculous, I know.
Towbars are a bit more understandable. The risk increases because you will not only be insured for driving a car but also for towing a vehicle and that changes the way a vehicle handles, increasing the risk of accident. Look at the aftermath of a towing vehicle jack knifing or a caravan toppling on a motorway.
If you reverse in to anything your twobar will cause a lot more damage than your bumper, even at low speed.
So having a towbar does increase the risk of higher claims
Every car insurance quote I've filled in for many years have asked if the car has been modified and, if you say it has, gives a list of the modifications they're interested in. If you have more than 2 mods the comparison sites usually won't quote and you have to contact individual companies. I bought my car new and had several options fitted at the factory but I don't consider any of these to be mods as they came out of the factory already fitted I do confess to the tow bar and engine chip which were fitted after-market.
Have to say I'd not have considered that as something worth mentioning, any more than fitting a larger rear view mirror, or adding a back windscreen heater, or fitting a new gear knob. I envisage modifications as something like an upgraded suspension, or dropping in a V6 engine, converting it to be open top, etc.. Luckily I've not done anything like adding a towbar to cars I have owned.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.