I Wonder Why This Number Is Rising So...
Politics6 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by jacobc4. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.the highway code is for all cars, bikes, cycles, and padestrians a like and it is law,, this mans lawer should know this and tell him that he does not have a leg to stand on,, cyclist think they r exepmt from the highway code which is incorrect...
u should counter sue him for breaking the law of the highway code...
ianess,,,
u will find that the highway code is law,,,
read it carefully and it will tell u that it is or at leasts parts of it is law,,,
cyclist crossing red lights is against the law but they still do it...
go to this link and it will show u and tell u .
http://www.theorytestadvice.co.uk/HCPlus/3_Rules_45_-_66/3_rules_45_-_66.html
SOLICITOR:
Whether or not Undertaking was defined as 'Breaking the Law' - The cyclist Suing you is Civil law rather than Criminal Law anyhow. So what would have to be proved is a 'wrong' - law of Tort.
Indeed,you and the passenger owed a duty of care towards the cyclist and therefore he can and probably will clami damages. Also Criminal actions could be brought by the CPS, dependent on evidence provided by the Police
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.