Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Danger of young drivers?
Young drivers pay expensive insurance premiums to be on allowed on the road, but does that make them safe? We've all seen them driving around with their music blazing and probably going too fast. Is this a sweeping generalisation or do you think the minimum driving age should be increased so that we have more mature people driving vehicles that have the power to destroy lives and families in seconds?
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Asks. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I would rather see a limit as to the type of engine a newly qualified driver could drive. Give them a 1l fiesta with no stereo.
Maturity does not always come with age. As soon as they pass their test, those who are the type to drive around like loons and pay more attention to their phone or stereo than their speed or surrounding hazards will still do it, regardless of whether they are 17 or 20.
Maturity does not always come with age. As soon as they pass their test, those who are the type to drive around like loons and pay more attention to their phone or stereo than their speed or surrounding hazards will still do it, regardless of whether they are 17 or 20.
richie 1976 is right. there are many things that we see everyday as drivers and it's not always young drivers that are driving anti-socially. whether it's mobile phone abuse, aggressive driving, looking in the rearview mirror putting on makeup etc. so, i don't think raising the age limit would be a better idea but raising awareness should be.
Personally I think an element of psychometric testing should be introduced as some people, no matter how old or experienced, really shouldn't be in charge of a kiddies tricycle, let alone a car.
For example regular motorway users will be aware of the many supposedly 'professional' drivers who drive absolutely abysmally, much worse than a clued up teenager: how often do you see a line of HGV's being driven flat out on the limiter at less than a car's length behind the one in front, while the drivers stuff their faces or yack on their phones? Yet these are drivers with many years and miles of experience who should obviously know better....but they seem oblivious to the danger to themselves, and, more importantly, others, and don't seem to have learned anything..........yet a properly switched on but inexperienced driver given the right mindset (pass-plus is good) will learn and become a safe and considerate driver.
As in all things- it's not the age, it's the attitude.
For example regular motorway users will be aware of the many supposedly 'professional' drivers who drive absolutely abysmally, much worse than a clued up teenager: how often do you see a line of HGV's being driven flat out on the limiter at less than a car's length behind the one in front, while the drivers stuff their faces or yack on their phones? Yet these are drivers with many years and miles of experience who should obviously know better....but they seem oblivious to the danger to themselves, and, more importantly, others, and don't seem to have learned anything..........yet a properly switched on but inexperienced driver given the right mindset (pass-plus is good) will learn and become a safe and considerate driver.
As in all things- it's not the age, it's the attitude.
Statistically the most accidents per mile are women over 70 so I guess you'd have to ban them too.
Of course the figures for young drivers are skewed because by definition a 18 year old has been driving less than 2 years.
If you were to raise the driving age up to say 20 the number of accidents in the 20-25 year old range would go up due to inexperience.
You then get into a "where do you draw the line debate"
redcrx's suggestion is good But I'd limit the car someone car drive to say less than 80-90 BHP/tonne in the first 2 years after getting a license
Of course the figures for young drivers are skewed because by definition a 18 year old has been driving less than 2 years.
If you were to raise the driving age up to say 20 the number of accidents in the 20-25 year old range would go up due to inexperience.
You then get into a "where do you draw the line debate"
redcrx's suggestion is good But I'd limit the car someone car drive to say less than 80-90 BHP/tonne in the first 2 years after getting a license
You may well be noselittle, but unfortunately many of your peer group are not - there is a disproportionately high number of deaths among male drivers under 21 which is largely brought about by bravado (in front of their mates) and therefore they are just simply too immature to handle the huge responsibility of driving a car.
As a result, and as unfair as it may possibly be to the likes of you who may be a good driver, I feel the group as a whole needs to be tarred with the same brush.
Similarly, I'd introduce a maximum age for driving - I'm sure there are many 80 year olds who are good drivers, but there are many who no longer have the reaction times required to drive in today's busy world.
And while we're on the subject, I'd also go for a mandatory re-test for everybody every five years or so.
As a result, and as unfair as it may possibly be to the likes of you who may be a good driver, I feel the group as a whole needs to be tarred with the same brush.
Similarly, I'd introduce a maximum age for driving - I'm sure there are many 80 year olds who are good drivers, but there are many who no longer have the reaction times required to drive in today's busy world.
And while we're on the subject, I'd also go for a mandatory re-test for everybody every five years or so.
1 to 11 of 11
Latest Posts
Christmas In The Good Old Days
ChatterBank20 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles45 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles55 mins ago
