Crosswords1 min ago
oncoming traffic
5 Answers
the 3rd party is disputing liablitity as at the scene he said i was speeding however this was not the case and i have a witness to confirm this also what happens next will this go to court
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rennie78. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hi Rennie
There are a number of variables in your question however, hopefully this'll help ....
Did the Police attend and, if they did, did they aportion blame or charge anyone ?
How does the other driver know you were speeding .... I wasn't aware that the naked eye was an effective and accurate speed calculation device ?! Speed is difficult to accurately work out without the benefit of radar, speed detection cameras, calibrated speedometers on Police vehicles etc. Even the old fashioned method of measuring skid marks on the road is difficult with modern technology in most cars which prevent skidding .... ABS, Brake Assistance System, etc .... bottom line, someone saying you were speeding with no other evidence ain't gonna cut it ....
I assume the only matter in dispute here was your speed given you haven't mentioned anything else and, on that basis, the witness you make mention of who can testify that you weren't speeding, can they also testify as to what happened .... who did what, who was to blame, where the cars were positioned both pre and post crash ....?
Are they independent ?
What are your insurance company saying about the whole incident .... are they aportioning blame, disputing liability, etc ?
Dunno if I've helped or raised more questions ??!!
Cheers
S
There are a number of variables in your question however, hopefully this'll help ....
Did the Police attend and, if they did, did they aportion blame or charge anyone ?
How does the other driver know you were speeding .... I wasn't aware that the naked eye was an effective and accurate speed calculation device ?! Speed is difficult to accurately work out without the benefit of radar, speed detection cameras, calibrated speedometers on Police vehicles etc. Even the old fashioned method of measuring skid marks on the road is difficult with modern technology in most cars which prevent skidding .... ABS, Brake Assistance System, etc .... bottom line, someone saying you were speeding with no other evidence ain't gonna cut it ....
I assume the only matter in dispute here was your speed given you haven't mentioned anything else and, on that basis, the witness you make mention of who can testify that you weren't speeding, can they also testify as to what happened .... who did what, who was to blame, where the cars were positioned both pre and post crash ....?
Are they independent ?
What are your insurance company saying about the whole incident .... are they aportioning blame, disputing liability, etc ?
Dunno if I've helped or raised more questions ??!!
Cheers
S