Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Jackson Documentary
432 Answers
Has peeved me off.
I refuse to believe Jackson was a sexual predator. I think the situations are very extreme, Jackson's mental health and personal situation needs to be seriously taken into account but he's dead so that's why they're doing it now. One story.
It's ignorant.
I refuse to believe Jackson was a sexual predator. I think the situations are very extreme, Jackson's mental health and personal situation needs to be seriously taken into account but he's dead so that's why they're doing it now. One story.
It's ignorant.
Answers
Here is a possible sequence of events: * The weirdo Michael Jackson invites kids to stay at his place. * The kids' parents allow them to stay, unprotected. * The negligent parents later realise they now fortunately have immense power over Jackson, simply because they were irresponsibl e enough to let their kids stay with this weirdo. * They blackmail Jackson...
17:46 Thu 07th Mar 2019
Oh he was killed by his doctor... Why?
So much paint was thrown over MJ he stood tall an kept his morals all the time. He was a soft man.
I've watched absolutely every documentary on him and if i even once thought he was actually a sexual predator then i'd admit it.. But i can't. Vibes are important.
So much paint was thrown over MJ he stood tall an kept his morals all the time. He was a soft man.
I've watched absolutely every documentary on him and if i even once thought he was actually a sexual predator then i'd admit it.. But i can't. Vibes are important.
spath - // So many eyes were on him, people trying to extract this evidence where is it? Why so long? Why now he's died? Why so long after he's died? //
You have to remember that the 'so many eyes … ' that were on him - in terms of people who could absolutely corroborate or disprove these accusations, were all in his employ.
You can buy silence from everyone around you when you have the kind of money Michael Jackson had.
Add to that his notoriously litigious personality, and his ability to acquire support of the best legal brains in the world, and you make a veritable fortress of secrecy around a very very strange man.
I call bull.
You have to remember that the 'so many eyes … ' that were on him - in terms of people who could absolutely corroborate or disprove these accusations, were all in his employ.
You can buy silence from everyone around you when you have the kind of money Michael Jackson had.
Add to that his notoriously litigious personality, and his ability to acquire support of the best legal brains in the world, and you make a veritable fortress of secrecy around a very very strange man.
I call bull.
He was not tried 'many times....so many times' (you don't appear to have been paying much attention to all the documentaries you have watched).
You may not like the fact that people who were around him on a regular basis have told stories about his unhealthy interest in, and behaviour with, young boys......but the wealth of evidence stacking up against him cannot be easily dismissed.
You may not like the fact that people who were around him on a regular basis have told stories about his unhealthy interest in, and behaviour with, young boys......but the wealth of evidence stacking up against him cannot be easily dismissed.
spath - // AH exactly, innocent until proven guilty. Not guilty and innocent.
He went to trial lets not forget. //
I am not forgetting - but he would be far from the first, or last, individual to be aquitted of crimes that he actually committed.
There is what is known, and what can be proven in a court of law, and they are often not the same thing.
Please don't misunderstand, I am as firm a believer in the concept of innocence until guilt is proven as anyone, but that does not blind me to the fact that people can, and do, walk free from court as guilty men and women - just not convicted men and women.
He went to trial lets not forget. //
I am not forgetting - but he would be far from the first, or last, individual to be aquitted of crimes that he actually committed.
There is what is known, and what can be proven in a court of law, and they are often not the same thing.
Please don't misunderstand, I am as firm a believer in the concept of innocence until guilt is proven as anyone, but that does not blind me to the fact that people can, and do, walk free from court as guilty men and women - just not convicted men and women.