Crosswords1 min ago
Lennons Killer Denied Parole
15 Answers
i wonder had lennon been murdered over here, would the killer have been freed years ago.
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/new s/12509 155/joh n-lenno n-kille r-denie d-parol e-for-e leventh -time/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Plebslaughter and celebslaughter are two very different things, Bazile.
It may arise from the mindset of some folk being considered more worthy of respect and adoration that's a hangover from feudal times, cap doffing and all that.
It could be that he was part of a thing that changed the world, for good or ill, and deserves a small degree of reverence.
It could be that the release of killer is wrong and this case has it right.
I'm content to see him wither and die in prison.
It may arise from the mindset of some folk being considered more worthy of respect and adoration that's a hangover from feudal times, cap doffing and all that.
It could be that he was part of a thing that changed the world, for good or ill, and deserves a small degree of reverence.
It could be that the release of killer is wrong and this case has it right.
I'm content to see him wither and die in prison.
Bazile - // Ah right , so JL life is considered more worthy than A N Other , from Hemel Hempstead //
The So Rule rides again!
No-one has said that Mr Lennon's life is worth more or less than a non-famous person.
Douglas has hinted that such a concept may be behind the sentencing, but neither he, or anyone else, has actually said so.
The OP ponders if Mr Chapman would have been released by now had he been sentenced by a British court, and that is certainly possible, but of course, it's a question no-one can actually answer definitively, so thoughts can, and are, being offered.
The So Rule rides again!
No-one has said that Mr Lennon's life is worth more or less than a non-famous person.
Douglas has hinted that such a concept may be behind the sentencing, but neither he, or anyone else, has actually said so.
The OP ponders if Mr Chapman would have been released by now had he been sentenced by a British court, and that is certainly possible, but of course, it's a question no-one can actually answer definitively, so thoughts can, and are, being offered.
douglas - // It could be that he was part of a thing that changed the world, for good or ill, and deserves a small degree of reverence. //
I think you may have a point.
Sometimes a crime is of such seismic impact that it may need to be reflected in the punishment delivered, and its ongoing review as time passes.
We cannot know if that is the case, but it is an interesting notion none the less.
I think you may have a point.
Sometimes a crime is of such seismic impact that it may need to be reflected in the punishment delivered, and its ongoing review as time passes.
We cannot know if that is the case, but it is an interesting notion none the less.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.