ChatterBank3 mins ago
So Can We Stop It With The Latest Cobras Now?
78 Answers
Answers
Apparently things tend to mutate to be less harmful. It makes sense because killing off your host is not the best survival strategy.
22:27 Wed 01st Dec 2021
// Does anybody know if each successive strain gradually gets weaker or grows stronger//
yes we do: but people dont read the explanations because they are wheeling out tired old one liners vulvan, like
foo what dat mean - - - and
I havent read it, but its twaddle (thx to naomi, this very afternoon)
An epidemic strain gets more virulent as an epidemic continues - - -
a. dont ask me why it is an advantage to kill the host (Rushton 1980)
b. Defoe and others noticed the rat wasnt needed in later plague episodes as the human cases came contagious themselves (1689). Bloody spit was the danger sign - patients to keep away from !
c. if you want a decent pathogen, passage froo human tissue, if you want a vaccine, passage froo lab animal. Culture reqts virtually the same. Porton Down ( you know the novichik place) 1970
d.by observation- - - in the flu epidemic 1918
omicron being less virulent is deffo NOT following the text books. If a strain gets LESS virulent then the epidemic implodes.
so an epidemic does get more virulent
because if it didnt it would stop being an epidemic pronto.
If you have a partially immune population you need a higher R number ( tranmission factor) in order to keep the successful hit rate above 1.
(you may now foo gristle and whine:
why he use deffo and pronto? why he speak Italian?
what he know about dis?
"who defoe- he mean deffo or de foo!" and so on
lots of brainless one liners waiting to be generated... )
someone asked - honestly someone asked
yes we do: but people dont read the explanations because they are wheeling out tired old one liners vulvan, like
foo what dat mean - - - and
I havent read it, but its twaddle (thx to naomi, this very afternoon)
An epidemic strain gets more virulent as an epidemic continues - - -
a. dont ask me why it is an advantage to kill the host (Rushton 1980)
b. Defoe and others noticed the rat wasnt needed in later plague episodes as the human cases came contagious themselves (1689). Bloody spit was the danger sign - patients to keep away from !
c. if you want a decent pathogen, passage froo human tissue, if you want a vaccine, passage froo lab animal. Culture reqts virtually the same. Porton Down ( you know the novichik place) 1970
d.by observation- - - in the flu epidemic 1918
omicron being less virulent is deffo NOT following the text books. If a strain gets LESS virulent then the epidemic implodes.
so an epidemic does get more virulent
because if it didnt it would stop being an epidemic pronto.
If you have a partially immune population you need a higher R number ( tranmission factor) in order to keep the successful hit rate above 1.
(you may now foo gristle and whine:
why he use deffo and pronto? why he speak Italian?
what he know about dis?
"who defoe- he mean deffo or de foo!" and so on
lots of brainless one liners waiting to be generated... )
someone asked - honestly someone asked
high infection is irrelevant if the effects are minimal
I don't know about this - the more people are infected, the more chance of further mutations. No surprise that so far they've come from Brazil, southern Africa, India, and the first one from England - the countries that let the virus spread. Maybe this one has mild effects; maybe one that mutates from it won't.
I don't know about this - the more people are infected, the more chance of further mutations. No surprise that so far they've come from Brazil, southern Africa, India, and the first one from England - the countries that let the virus spread. Maybe this one has mild effects; maybe one that mutates from it won't.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.