Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
did anyone see a young American singer called Jackie Evancho
she was featured recently on BGT i think. She is the 13 year old who either won, or was on another talent show possibly american idol, If anyone did see her, were you impressed or not quite sure if its her singing, because i can't believe a 13 year old and shes been singing for a while, is for real or whether shes just very good at lip synching. Because i couldn't marry up the soprano voice that comes out of this little girl. Forget charlotte church, this is something quite different.
Answers
http:// www. youtube. com/ watch? v= XyBIsfxWw5k
06:00 Mon 06th Jun 2011
quizmonkey totally agree, but when you hear her speak that's what i find difficult to adjust to. The singing and speaking voice just don't marry up. If its her then she has
a remarkable voice, but what i really didn't like is she looked too made up and too knowing for a 13 year old, like a mini Kathryn Jenkins, and i dislike her intensely.
a remarkable voice, but what i really didn't like is she looked too made up and too knowing for a 13 year old, like a mini Kathryn Jenkins, and i dislike her intensely.
I saw her and was quite moved. Nice to see proper talent on show for once, as opposed to a dancing grandad or other such rubbish.
Don't really understand your last post about her being too 'knowing', whatever that means. Also, she is 11 not 13.
She has one of the most amazing voices I have ever heard and for her age she has no equal.
Don't really understand your last post about her being too 'knowing', whatever that means. Also, she is 11 not 13.
She has one of the most amazing voices I have ever heard and for her age she has no equal.
on any number of websites i looked up it gave her age as 13, but wiki says 11, as you have pointed out. If you don't know what i mean about knowing, its like those ghastly beauty pageants in USA, where little girls wear grown up makeup, clothes, and project themselves in a way that smacks of Lolita, If she's 11, then she certainly didn't look it.
Hmm, we must have watched very different programmes.
I watched this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyBIsfxWw5k
No coiffeur, lipstick, false eyelashes, mascara, blusher, foundation etc.
Just a young girl in a dress with her hair parted.
I saw nothing like this, as you described her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyBIsfxWw5k
So what exactly is your point?
I watched this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyBIsfxWw5k
No coiffeur, lipstick, false eyelashes, mascara, blusher, foundation etc.
Just a young girl in a dress with her hair parted.
I saw nothing like this, as you described her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyBIsfxWw5k
So what exactly is your point?
I think it is an enormous change that SC will most likely ruin her for commercial gain.
She could do a Katherine Jenkins and get her voice fully trained at somewhere like the Jullliard or the RCMand then tackle both opera/serious music and lighter stuff, the latter for the money.
Unfortunately I suspect SC will want to continue to make his millions on this irl - poor thing but if he does the decent thing, then all credit to him as she could really be worth something down the line and with maturity of the voice.
She could do a Katherine Jenkins and get her voice fully trained at somewhere like the Jullliard or the RCMand then tackle both opera/serious music and lighter stuff, the latter for the money.
Unfortunately I suspect SC will want to continue to make his millions on this irl - poor thing but if he does the decent thing, then all credit to him as she could really be worth something down the line and with maturity of the voice.
LL, thanks for pointing out my glaring error!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeGBFgNxewc
I saw nothing like that in little Miss Evancho.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeGBFgNxewc
I saw nothing like that in little Miss Evancho.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.