ChatterBank4 mins ago
Socialism in grades..
19 Answers
http://www.snopes.com...ge/exam/socialism.asp
This probably never happened but it serves as brilliant explanation as to why socialism cannot possibly work. So why are there still people who think socialsm can work?
This probably never happened but it serves as brilliant explanation as to why socialism cannot possibly work. So why are there still people who think socialsm can work?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kayless. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.the USA uses a socialist system in running the NFL, funnily enough
http://libertysflame....dart.cgi?ArtNum=17010
http://libertysflame....dart.cgi?ArtNum=17010
In America at the minute the wealthy are getting richer. In contrast, the middle level workers haven't seen an increase in their incomes, in real terms, for years. Yet there are many more middle class people than there are wealthy. Which of those groups is producing the wealth?
It's a sad reflection on American society that people dread long term illness because they know it will ruin them financially.
It's a sad reflection on American society that people dread long term illness because they know it will ruin them financially.
Love her or hate her, it was your own Maggie Thatcher that, quite correctly, said "Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them..."
Actually, thoroughly understood, the National Football League (NFL) here in the U.S., is an example of a top down Oligarchy, since all financial power is retained by and within the ownership... the teams are not publicly traded on Wall Street, meaning, I can't buy shares in any team. The players have formed a union, but it works less than satisfactorily. All in all, both the players and the owners make fantastic sums, since the enormous stadiums in which they play (only 6 months out of the year) are financed by the taxpayers who, in turn, charge the owners a sum to repay the bonds... over 20 to 25 years, usually. Same thing holds for American style baseball...
Actually, thoroughly understood, the National Football League (NFL) here in the U.S., is an example of a top down Oligarchy, since all financial power is retained by and within the ownership... the teams are not publicly traded on Wall Street, meaning, I can't buy shares in any team. The players have formed a union, but it works less than satisfactorily. All in all, both the players and the owners make fantastic sums, since the enormous stadiums in which they play (only 6 months out of the year) are financed by the taxpayers who, in turn, charge the owners a sum to repay the bonds... over 20 to 25 years, usually. Same thing holds for American style baseball...
Tony, I disagree. People who contribute most to the system don't usually want to take more. They strive to be self-sufficient. We rarely take anything at all - but we contribute plenty. It's natural, and right, for people to want to reap the benefits of their labour. If that is taken away, there is no incentive to work hard to improve ones standard of living.
On a purely practical note, socialism will never work because sooner or later (usually sooner) you run out of other people's money to spend.
(I take no credit for this philosophy, but I recall it being said by somebody who knows far more about this sort of thing than I ever will. I've always remembered it and it seems to be quite true).
(I take no credit for this philosophy, but I recall it being said by somebody who knows far more about this sort of thing than I ever will. I've always remembered it and it seems to be quite true).
For Clanad
Re NFL etc.
Can you explain why anyone(city taxpayers) is prepared to build stadiums for these teams rather that have them finance their own facility?
Also, I have heard in the past that the 'College Draft' system that is operated by the major sports is actually illegal and would not ever survive any legal challenge. It only exists because all agree it is the best way to prevent any one team achieving permanent dominance of any sport.
Appreciate your input on this.
Re NFL etc.
Can you explain why anyone(city taxpayers) is prepared to build stadiums for these teams rather that have them finance their own facility?
Also, I have heard in the past that the 'College Draft' system that is operated by the major sports is actually illegal and would not ever survive any legal challenge. It only exists because all agree it is the best way to prevent any one team achieving permanent dominance of any sport.
Appreciate your input on this.
There are two trains of thought on the subjects of public financing of sports stadiums, Howard. One being that the added activity, such as parking fees, restaurants, souvenirs, hotel rooms, etc., will generate tax income the city would not otherwise see. In fact, owners of the teams hold it as a club over the heads of the cities threatening to move their team to a friendlier city if a new stadium isn't built.
However, the other thought, backed up by a lot of data, is that years after being built, the stadiums still aren't paid for and the city has actually lost money that could have been used for more useful projects... escpecially in blighted areas.
It comes down to any major city wanting (along with the fans, of course) sports teams for the ego stoking that goes along with it.
Actually, (on another metioned subject) we read here that NHS is not doing that well and health care in the U.K., for all practical purposes, is rationed and will become more so in the future. Canada is deep in talks to restructure their own government funded (read: taxes) system.
About every other week or so, we see news reports aobut Canadians that can't get needed services and elect to come to the U.S. and pay for it, getting it quickly and efficiently.
Thing is, world-wide, health care is going to continue to eat up major sections of governemnt funding and severe rationing will be the result. A government can offer full and unlimited healthcare because people, being people, will jaunt off the Doctor's office each time they have a twinge... in y opinion...
However, the other thought, backed up by a lot of data, is that years after being built, the stadiums still aren't paid for and the city has actually lost money that could have been used for more useful projects... escpecially in blighted areas.
It comes down to any major city wanting (along with the fans, of course) sports teams for the ego stoking that goes along with it.
Actually, (on another metioned subject) we read here that NHS is not doing that well and health care in the U.K., for all practical purposes, is rationed and will become more so in the future. Canada is deep in talks to restructure their own government funded (read: taxes) system.
About every other week or so, we see news reports aobut Canadians that can't get needed services and elect to come to the U.S. and pay for it, getting it quickly and efficiently.
Thing is, world-wide, health care is going to continue to eat up major sections of governemnt funding and severe rationing will be the result. A government can offer full and unlimited healthcare because people, being people, will jaunt off the Doctor's office each time they have a twinge... in y opinion...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.