They Are All In This Together---They Just Can Not Help It Can They.

[gulliver1]

Infosy..A firm founded by Richi Sunak's father in law is now under investigation in a multimillion pound dispute with HMRC..
Sunaks wife holds a stake in this Co also. They are disputing a tax bill of £20m.....Mrs Sunak shares in this Company is a mere £700m.
......"Only the poor pay tax " ...It's stopped out of their wages...
.........One Law for the rich Eh.

[Blubster]

Zzzzzz...

[naomi24]

I looked at a report but saw nothing about an investigation - merely that that company disputes the bill it’s received from the taxman.

[gulliver1]

If one disputes something then it has to be looked at .
...."Investigated" Scrutinized ,searched,Questioned,
Nose around, etc . Get the drift... @ 13.16

[youngmafbog]

Are you responsible for your father in law's actions Gully?

And you are aware holding a stake in a company does not mean you have any say in how it it run?

[youngmafbog]

From The Guardian:
//A spokesperson for Infosys told the Guardian: “Infosys provides details of certain ongoing disputes with various regulatory authorities, including this specific tax matter with HMRC. The company has filed an appeal against a tax assessment in the UK and has obtained a stay on the payment of the tax demand from HMRC.”

Narayana Murthy is no longer involved in the direct management of Infosys, after resigning from a senior role in 2014. Akshata Murty is also not involved in running the company//

So what is the problem? Company doesnt like the tax assessment and appeals - so what happens every hour of the day.

[gulliver1]

This Tax dispute involving Sunaks FIL which has nothing to do with Sunak according to YMB ,comes at a sensitive time for the PM Who only last week had to sack Zahawi for tax irregularities. Also his own wife has been under scrutiny for claiming non- dom status to lessen her tax bill.. nothing to do with PM Sunack of course.

[naomi24]

Gulliver, don’t be ridiculous. The company is disputing a tax bill, that’s all. Nothing more than that.

[bazwillrun]

...and the more it gets to you the bigger my smile gets...

[youngmafbog]

//This Tax dispute involving Sunaks FIL which has nothing to do with Sunak according to YMB//

Yes, and it is correct.

I will ask you again, are you responsible or your father in laws actions?

[youngmafbog]

I will ask you again, are you responsible or your father in laws actions?

And it has nothing to do with wealth.

Are you going to answer the question?

[gulliver1]

14 .37.....And I will tell you again...
....They are all in this together......

[nicebloke1]

If you have millions to hide, spreading it round the family members is not uncommon.

[ToraToraTora]

Gully have you ever read Aesop's fables? You're in most of them!

[gulliver1]

TTT@ 14.49. Have you ever read any Enid Blyton stories , they are aimed at the ten to thirteen year olds should be right up your street.

[Peter Pedant]

I will ask you again, are you responsible or your father in laws actions?
I w ill respond more than waaarnce

yes if he has left you anything ( inheritance ( tax dispute)
yes if you were there when he DID it ! ( accomplice etc)
yes if you incited him
yes if you drove him there to 'DO' it

gormless q with four gormlesser answers
normal day on Ab then

[Peter Pedant]

If one disputes something then it has to be looked at .
yes disputed facts merit an inquiry/further investigation

zahawi - very little was disputed ( apparently), so it was a matter of a decision

Raab - the poor little bullied mandarins have made it clear they will only testify if anonymised ( which goes against one of the principles of english law) - AND the facts are disputed

[Peter Pedant]

wives are v difficult

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990115/pino01.htm - In re Pincochet no 2 (*).

Lord Snooty LJ ( Hoffman) was giving a judgement concerning Pinochet on whether he could be indicted whilst he was in London for medical treatment
and it came lately ( after his lordships judgement) that his wife was working for Amnesty International - and it was decided that this was a fatal conflict

Reeshi is only PM - Ld Hoffman - The Hoff took it badly



(*)screams of foo what dat den from all sides