ChatterBank1 min ago
Ukraine
The Ukraine president wants the agreement of the British and US governments , to allow him to use western missiles against targets inside Russia .
Should he be given permission ?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If Putin is allowed to beat Ukraine, he will think that the West is weak and will not stop there. He will then attack the Baltic countries and probably Poland (although that will be a bigger risk for him). If he attacks Poland then World War 3 will begin as Poland is a NATO country.
Therefore Putin has to be defeated. If the Russian people are behind him, then he will continue ad infinitum. Therefore the only way to stop the war is for the Russian people to rebel against him.
Russian propaganda is minimalising the losses to Russia and the Russian people are not aware of what is actually taking place, therefore so that they understand, Russia itself must be targeted by Ukraine, otherwise the consequences for Europe will be dire.
Therefore yes, permission should be granted. You have to ask, would Putin want to attack the UK or the USA, as he knows what would happen to Russia then?
The u.k is in a desperate state, so our p.m. decides to supply Ukraine with missiles costing almost a million pounds in addition to the billions already thrown their way, meanwhile people back here queue at food bank's, sit shivering in their homes, unable to access Dr's dentists, or hospital care, you couldn't make it up. But hey ho let's listen to all the war mongerers on here again.
Yes. If we wish to support someone then it's ridiculous to say they can't use what we send in the way that actually helps rather than perpetuates. Legitimate targets are legitimate targets.
It's actually anti-warmongering to do the right thing and agree, as it's vital to prevent such empire expansion ftom dodgy nations, since the alternative simply encourages more war in the future.
I don't see why there should be any debate. What is the point of donating weapons they are not allowed to use? Surely when these weapons were given, it was on the assumption they would be fired at the enemy.
A few bombs on Moscow might wake up Putins enablers to realise he is doing their country more harm than good, and remove him.
Given Irans intervention I think the answer has to be yes. Storm Shadow wont reach Moscow (unless the Ukrainians dig right into Russian soil.
I do think there should be caveats such as they cannot be used unless Putin has fired a missile into Ukraine, for everyone he fires at civilian targets he will get one back, be difficult for Putin to argue against that if it is made public knowledge first.