Another Hypocritical Labour With A Short Memory

[webbo3]

https://ibb.co/z4nJL4J

[ToraToraTora]

whoops!

[Deskdiary]

Don't forget (can't even be bothered to try to remember her name) one of Robber Reeves underlings said last week, with a straight face, that if they did not remove the WFA there could have been a "...run on the pound...". Now everybody with even an ounce of common sense knows that was abject nonsense, so the thing that really gets up my nose is that they take voters for fools and expect them to believe their lies.

[naomi24]

They know they're fools.  They voted for them.

[Deskdiary]

I really struggle to believe that any Labour voter, even nicebloke, genuinely believes not removing the WFA would have caused a run on the pound. 
 

Perhaps I'm giving them too much credit.

[ToraToraTora]

18:49.... well if you can find a Labour voter ask them!

[Deskdiary]

^^^quite Tora - funny that, isn't it: the silence is deafening.

 

Nicebloke tries to put up an argument, but when he inevitably fails, for some bizarre reason he calls people 'lovey', me included. Gulliver also tries, but it's Gulliver who I am convinced is 'special' so can be roundly ignored (I see he's in AB Jail. Again).

 

Given how vocal the far left on this board were when the crappy Tories were running the show, you'd like to think they had the integrity to admit Starmer, Robber "made-up black hole" Reeves and Poundland Barbie were poor. But that's always been the trouble with the far-left: even though they know current Govt are dogshite, they just simply will not be able to admit it.