News0 min ago
Bnp party political broadcast on tv.
21 Answers
Just saw this and what a lot of old cobblers. Nick griffin buying canoes for teenagers and paying for hip replacements.Does anyone know if Hitler did anything similar before he rose to power?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Teddy_boy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your implication is that Griffin will rise to power.
Me thinks not - the Brits electorate are not that stoopid.
Having said that, AV could have some impact on letting minority "parties" and, yes I hesitate to call his shower a party, a bigger platform for spouting their insensitive and fundamentally racist crap/hogwash. That is a little dangerous and a reason for voting for the single vote.
Me thinks not - the Brits electorate are not that stoopid.
Having said that, AV could have some impact on letting minority "parties" and, yes I hesitate to call his shower a party, a bigger platform for spouting their insensitive and fundamentally racist crap/hogwash. That is a little dangerous and a reason for voting for the single vote.
Sorry but Hitler was elected chancellor , but not Fuhrer.Its a common misconception.
" Hitler became Führer (Supreme Leader) on August 2, 1934: he'd been Chancellor of Germany since January 30, 1933. Very technically, Hitler was never actually elected, but he did take power legally under the laws of the then-Weimar Republic, which he almost immediately abolished. Until Hitler was appointed Chancellor, the Nazis never held an actual majority in the government and the parliament. "
" Hitler became Führer (Supreme Leader) on August 2, 1934: he'd been Chancellor of Germany since January 30, 1933. Very technically, Hitler was never actually elected, but he did take power legally under the laws of the then-Weimar Republic, which he almost immediately abolished. Until Hitler was appointed Chancellor, the Nazis never held an actual majority in the government and the parliament. "
Hitler was appointed Chancellor under President Paul von Hindenburg on January 30, 1933, as part of a coalition government originally intended to hold the wobbly democracy together, but Hitler wanted no democracy and engineered things so that President Hindenburg was forced to dissolve parliament and hold new elections. Using violence and anti-Communist hysteria to their advantage, on election day, March 6, 1933, the Nazis increased their result to 44% of the vote, making them the largest party in Germany, but still not giving them an absolute majority. Nevertheless, continuing to use violence or the threat of it, plus clever political subterfuge, Hitler consolidated his power in the parliament until he had successfully, and apparently legally, suppressed all the other political parties.
When Hindenburg died on August 2, 1934, Hitler's cabinet passed a law transferring the power of the presidency to Hitler as both Chancellor and Führer (Leader).
Anyway back to Nick Griffin.Would he need the same set of circumstances to ever gain power in the UK?I cant see him running the country under any other circumstances.
When Hindenburg died on August 2, 1934, Hitler's cabinet passed a law transferring the power of the presidency to Hitler as both Chancellor and Führer (Leader).
Anyway back to Nick Griffin.Would he need the same set of circumstances to ever gain power in the UK?I cant see him running the country under any other circumstances.
-- answer removed --
I dont draw a connection between the weimar and the 5th may elections. Only a connection between fascist political views .The only lesson i see is tht to give overall control to a political party , or leader , has long ranging and unforseeable efffects.You can see that today in both Libya and Syria.Not fascist countries but certainly family controlled dictatorships in my opinion.