Crosswords1 min ago
First MP to be jailed for expenses fraud freed, is this fair?
23 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/3wu3av9
That really sets a good example doesn't it, only serving four and a half months of a 18 month sentence. for falsely claiming more than £22,000 of taxpayers' money.
That really sets a good example doesn't it, only serving four and a half months of a 18 month sentence. for falsely claiming more than £22,000 of taxpayers' money.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
housemouse
/// Is The Daily Mail some form of comfort blanket to you aog.....oh what fun you have ///
No not at all, but it is obviously a 'bed of nails' for some, that is the fun I get, these people are just hilarious. Just take into account by their outbursts, how much it hurts them, when certain persons dare to enter one of DM's news stories,
I read all the papers, but the Daily Mail's web site is renowned for being the best, and besides they are not afraid to report on sensitive issues.
/// Is The Daily Mail some form of comfort blanket to you aog.....oh what fun you have ///
No not at all, but it is obviously a 'bed of nails' for some, that is the fun I get, these people are just hilarious. Just take into account by their outbursts, how much it hurts them, when certain persons dare to enter one of DM's news stories,
I read all the papers, but the Daily Mail's web site is renowned for being the best, and besides they are not afraid to report on sensitive issues.
I love the DM & gossip. Who needs pseudo intellectual Guardian/FT/Times/Telegraph. I dont need to read of world affairs I cant change & get enuf on TV.
This suits me; poor Sarah didn't get a divorce payout any wonder she's broke.
http://www.dailymail....uffeured-Bentley.html
This suits me; poor Sarah didn't get a divorce payout any wonder she's broke.
http://www.dailymail....uffeured-Bentley.html
-- answer removed --
It's not about being 'fair' it's about the tarrif for fraud sentences, which have to be seen to be applied fairly.
The law does not enter into the minutia of whether people think that one fraud is more deserving of a stiffer sentence than another, there would never be any judgements if they went down that road.
The sentence may be lenient, but it is the current sentence, until Parlianment changes it.
The law does not enter into the minutia of whether people think that one fraud is more deserving of a stiffer sentence than another, there would never be any judgements if they went down that road.
The sentence may be lenient, but it is the current sentence, until Parlianment changes it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.