ChatterBank45 mins ago
Is afghanistan, america's vietnam II?
The US is to announce it is withdrawing from Afghanistan. It is hardly mission accomplished. Not quite as bad as Vietnam, but there is a hint of running away hurt. And the UK's objectives have not been accomplished either. Most people would admit the whole mission was a mistake (please feel free to prove me wrong).
What positives can the US (and the UK) take from this misadventure?
What positives can the US (and the UK) take from this misadventure?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.it's nothing like Vietnam. The West has tried to help this sh1t h0le to no avail, only a lefty anti western idiot would comprehend any similarity. Like all these Islamic sh1te h0les they don't want help. We should have realised it earlier and let them kill each other. I suppose you are going to try and dress it up as some sort of "defeat" I say it's like trying to help an old lady across the road that we realised finally did not want to cross.
I've put up a post on this - learn from history, or be condemned to repeat it.
war is the national sport of Afghanistan. Many great nations have fought there, been worn down and gone away. The Russians were the last lot.
What are the positives?
Perhaps USA and UK will learn at last to keep their noses out of wars they can't win.
war is the national sport of Afghanistan. Many great nations have fought there, been worn down and gone away. The Russians were the last lot.
What are the positives?
Perhaps USA and UK will learn at last to keep their noses out of wars they can't win.
My friend the Geezer,
The US (GW Bush) were eager to make friends with the Taliban, and talks took place in Texas (note the date in the link).
http://news.bbc.co.uk...d/west_asia/37021.stm
Clinton had been bombing the f**k out of the Taliban training camps in Afghanistan (no US or UK loses) in 1996. When Bush got in, instead he invited them round for tea and buiscuits.
The US (GW Bush) were eager to make friends with the Taliban, and talks took place in Texas (note the date in the link).
http://news.bbc.co.uk...d/west_asia/37021.stm
Clinton had been bombing the f**k out of the Taliban training camps in Afghanistan (no US or UK loses) in 1996. When Bush got in, instead he invited them round for tea and buiscuits.
Geezer, just like the Americans invaded Vietnam. To help them resist the wiles of communism, just like we wanted to help the noble Afghans resist the wicked Taliban. Turned out - in both cases - that if we'd asked first we might have found that neither wanted our help. So a lesson not learnt.
Seems to me the peope who sent soldieers there to die in vain are the ones doing British forces most harm.
Seems to me the peope who sent soldieers there to die in vain are the ones doing British forces most harm.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.