Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
EnteWhy oh why
11 Answers
cant we deport this garbage from wherever he came.
If he wants to fight it in the courts then let him do it from there.
http://www.thisislond...fights-deportation.do
will we ever learn ?
If he wants to fight it in the courts then let him do it from there.
http://www.thisislond...fights-deportation.do
will we ever learn ?
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
This is yet another example of the “Mission Creep” that has occurred with Human Rights legislation over recent years. The architects of the ECHR designed it to prevent signatory states denying a list of stated rights to citizens. Among those rights are freedom of expression and freedom not to suffer torture, inhumane or degrading treatment. As far as I know few people are denied freedom of expression in the UK and I don’t know of anybody who has been tortured recently.
Unfortunately these rights are not experienced worldwide and the difficulty that has arisen is that people from countries where their rights are not so well protected and who arrive here cannot be returned to their countries of origin because their rights are not enjoyed there. Effectively the courts have decided that the law means that the government must not only protect the rights of people already here but also those of anybody who happens to arrive here whether legally or not. Furthermore their behaviour here has no influence of whether they can be returned because protection of their rights has become paramount.
And so it is with this case. Now Mr Salah’s lawyer said: "We feel that this case is without merit and may breach several of my client's human rights including his Article 10 right to freedom of expression.” This is absurd. Nothing is preventing his client from expressing himself. He can do so wherever he wishes – except here. There is nothing in Article 10 that says he must be allowed freedom of expression specifically in the UK but courts have decided that this was the law intends.
I would suggest that there was never the intention to extend the rights afforded by the Convention to force signatory nations to host undesirable aliens so that they can continue to enjoy the rights they do not have at home. It is about time the UK government got to grips with this absurdity.
Unfortunately these rights are not experienced worldwide and the difficulty that has arisen is that people from countries where their rights are not so well protected and who arrive here cannot be returned to their countries of origin because their rights are not enjoyed there. Effectively the courts have decided that the law means that the government must not only protect the rights of people already here but also those of anybody who happens to arrive here whether legally or not. Furthermore their behaviour here has no influence of whether they can be returned because protection of their rights has become paramount.
And so it is with this case. Now Mr Salah’s lawyer said: "We feel that this case is without merit and may breach several of my client's human rights including his Article 10 right to freedom of expression.” This is absurd. Nothing is preventing his client from expressing himself. He can do so wherever he wishes – except here. There is nothing in Article 10 that says he must be allowed freedom of expression specifically in the UK but courts have decided that this was the law intends.
I would suggest that there was never the intention to extend the rights afforded by the Convention to force signatory nations to host undesirable aliens so that they can continue to enjoy the rights they do not have at home. It is about time the UK government got to grips with this absurdity.
Gosh isn't it funny the standard didn't use this picture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raed_Salah
One would almost think they had an agenda and were trying to stoke the flames!
How is it exactly we know he's a "Hate preacher" ? Oh of course the Standard tells us he was described as virulently anti-semitic in the House of Commons.
Well that settles it then! Anything said there must be right! No chance they might tell us who said that is there?
Oh Goodness me it was Mike Freer the *MP For Golders Green*
You must be feeling pretty dumb now eh?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raed_Salah
One would almost think they had an agenda and were trying to stoke the flames!
How is it exactly we know he's a "Hate preacher" ? Oh of course the Standard tells us he was described as virulently anti-semitic in the House of Commons.
Well that settles it then! Anything said there must be right! No chance they might tell us who said that is there?
Oh Goodness me it was Mike Freer the *MP For Golders Green*
You must be feeling pretty dumb now eh?
>>Mike was elected as the Member of Parliament in May 2010.
Mike lives in Finchley and previously represented Finchley Church End as a local Councillor. He is a member of Friends of Windsor Open Space, Conservative Friends of Israel <<
Raleigh maybe he was trying to show you that this person is hardly likely to speak any nice words about someone who tries to help palestine
Mike lives in Finchley and previously represented Finchley Church End as a local Councillor. He is a member of Friends of Windsor Open Space, Conservative Friends of Israel <<
Raleigh maybe he was trying to show you that this person is hardly likely to speak any nice words about someone who tries to help palestine
I really do despair at the lack of courage displayed by this awful coalition. Lets just deport the fecker to whatever sewer from which he has re-surfaced and take the consequences (or not) of any "judgement" from our nylon-robed friends in Strasburg, or wherever these jokers hold "court". Time for defiance to europe and its left-wing views.
1 to 11 of 11
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.