Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
EDF v UAF?
47 Answers
http://uaf.org.uk/201...lise-against-the-edl/
http://englishdefenceleague.org/tower-hamlet/
In the interests of equality, I post two links the first from the Unite Against Fascist's (UAF) web page, and the other from the English Defence League's (EDL) web page.
It is for others to judge which stands out as the most aggressive.
This also makes for interesting reading,
http://blogs.telegrap...eheaded-illiberalism/
http://englishdefenceleague.org/tower-hamlet/
In the interests of equality, I post two links the first from the Unite Against Fascist's (UAF) web page, and the other from the English Defence League's (EDL) web page.
It is for others to judge which stands out as the most aggressive.
This also makes for interesting reading,
http://blogs.telegrap...eheaded-illiberalism/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think the best way round this problem is to ban all other counter marches, when certain other marches are taking place.
If any group ignores the ban then the police should direct their energy towards these defaulters, and protect the legal marchers.
But this would never happen would it, because certain groups would not be able to get their own agendas across.
If any group ignores the ban then the police should direct their energy towards these defaulters, and protect the legal marchers.
But this would never happen would it, because certain groups would not be able to get their own agendas across.
Gromit
Thanks so much for that very informative video clip, puts an entirely different slant on things, and went along way to prove what I have been saying.
Your rather pathetic reference to the EDL running away, seems to me to be the most sensible action to take in the circumstances, considering the overwhelming number of Asians that are grouped ready to attack you.
They were sensibly obeying the polices instructions to make themselves scare, so no arrests as reported then, only being escorted for their own safety onto replacement transport.
What I also noticed was the drunken Asian yobbo, can in hand trying to provoke both the EDL members and also the police, but even after he was told a number of times to remove himself he still refused to do so.
But isn't it funny, that the police still did not arrest him?
Thanks so much for that very informative video clip, puts an entirely different slant on things, and went along way to prove what I have been saying.
Your rather pathetic reference to the EDL running away, seems to me to be the most sensible action to take in the circumstances, considering the overwhelming number of Asians that are grouped ready to attack you.
They were sensibly obeying the polices instructions to make themselves scare, so no arrests as reported then, only being escorted for their own safety onto replacement transport.
What I also noticed was the drunken Asian yobbo, can in hand trying to provoke both the EDL members and also the police, but even after he was told a number of times to remove himself he still refused to do so.
But isn't it funny, that the police still did not arrest him?
Stop digging Gromit by offering up these YouTube clips you are giving excellent support to the EDL, and I am sure that is not your intention.
But I think your interpretation of the local residents giving them a 'traditional English welcome'.a bit off.
How dare you suggest that this thuggish and unlawful behaviour is traditionally English.
But then you most likely thought the same regarding the recent riots and lootings?
Which only goes to prove how much standards have been allowed to drop in this country.
But I think your interpretation of the local residents giving them a 'traditional English welcome'.a bit off.
How dare you suggest that this thuggish and unlawful behaviour is traditionally English.
But then you most likely thought the same regarding the recent riots and lootings?
Which only goes to prove how much standards have been allowed to drop in this country.
I posted a few weeks ago, the England has a long tradition of rioting.
AOG: // Take what has happened recently in London, such a thing would not have happened in pre multi immigration England. //
Wrong. The British have a long tradition of rioting.
1517 - Evil May Day
1668 - Bawdy House Riots
1715 - English Political Riot, (London, England)[citation needed]
1720 - French Financial Riot, (Paris, France)[citation needed]
1721 - English Servants Riot, (London, England)[citation needed]
1727 - English Anti-Turnpike Riot, (Bristol, England)
1733 - London Anti-Tax Riot, (London, England)
1735 - English Anti-Turnpike Riots, (Hereford/Worcester, England)
1736 - Anti-Irish Riots, (Shoreditch/Spitalfields/Whitechapel, England)
1736 - Porteous Riots, (Edinburgh, Scotland)
1743 - London Gin Riots, (London, England)
1769 - Spitalfield Riots
1780 - Gordon Riots, (London, England)
1791 - Priestley Riots, (Birmingham, England)
1809 - Old Price Riots, 1809, (London, England)
1811-1812 - English Luddite Riots, (Leicester/York, England)
1814 - English Luddite Riots of 1814, (Leicester/York, England)
1816 - English Luddite Riots of 1816, (Leicester/York, England)
1830 - Swing Riots, (south and east of England)
1831 - Bristol Riots, (Bristol, England)
1910 - Tonypandy Riot (South Wales, UK)
1919 - Battle of Bow Street, (Bow Street, London, UK)
1919 - Luton Peace Day Riots, Luton U.K.
1936 - Battle of Cable Street, (London, England)
Of course all the about were before multiculturalism, so that xan't be the excuse.
AOG: // Take what has happened recently in London, such a thing would not have happened in pre multi immigration England. //
Wrong. The British have a long tradition of rioting.
1517 - Evil May Day
1668 - Bawdy House Riots
1715 - English Political Riot, (London, England)[citation needed]
1720 - French Financial Riot, (Paris, France)[citation needed]
1721 - English Servants Riot, (London, England)[citation needed]
1727 - English Anti-Turnpike Riot, (Bristol, England)
1733 - London Anti-Tax Riot, (London, England)
1735 - English Anti-Turnpike Riots, (Hereford/Worcester, England)
1736 - Anti-Irish Riots, (Shoreditch/Spitalfields/Whitechapel, England)
1736 - Porteous Riots, (Edinburgh, Scotland)
1743 - London Gin Riots, (London, England)
1769 - Spitalfield Riots
1780 - Gordon Riots, (London, England)
1791 - Priestley Riots, (Birmingham, England)
1809 - Old Price Riots, 1809, (London, England)
1811-1812 - English Luddite Riots, (Leicester/York, England)
1814 - English Luddite Riots of 1814, (Leicester/York, England)
1816 - English Luddite Riots of 1816, (Leicester/York, England)
1830 - Swing Riots, (south and east of England)
1831 - Bristol Riots, (Bristol, England)
1910 - Tonypandy Riot (South Wales, UK)
1919 - Battle of Bow Street, (Bow Street, London, UK)
1919 - Luton Peace Day Riots, Luton U.K.
1936 - Battle of Cable Street, (London, England)
Of course all the about were before multiculturalism, so that xan't be the excuse.
/// a suggestion which led the National Association of Muslim Police to accuse the police of not taking the threat of rightwing extremism seriously.///
A typical case of why special bodies such as the National Association of Muslim Police, should not be allowed.
How can such an organisation be seen as being strictly impartial?
A typical case of why special bodies such as the National Association of Muslim Police, should not be allowed.
How can such an organisation be seen as being strictly impartial?
Well, the Christian Police Association has managed to be impartial all these years.
http://www.cpauk.net/
I certainly haven't seen you calling for them to be disbanded.
http://www.cpauk.net/
I certainly haven't seen you calling for them to be disbanded.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.