Another threat to Britain allowed to stay here.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail....transport-London.html

Yet another of the worlds trash allowed to sponge off the nation he plotted against.

When are these judges going to think about victim's human rights?

They say they cannot deport him because he could face ‘inhumane treatment or punishment’.

What about his intended victims and now any future victims,was he or would he be bothered about their ‘inhumane treatment'?

[rov1100]

Having his photo published like that I think he might be safer back in his own country. There are fanatics in this country who would like to get their hands on him.

[askyourgran]

Oh dear, where is God with his thunderbolts when we need him.

[joeluke]

His human rights will be no consolation to those maimed/killed when he actually gets to carry out terrorism here

About time his sort mysteriously 'disappeared'

[oldnitro]

joeluke , you are absolutely right. this creature has no rights at all. If the legal system can`t/ won`t protect its citizens from the likes of these its time we got down into the gutter where they live and make sure they are no longer a threat.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - as you and I know of old, judges are obliged to stand by the letter of the law, regardless of their human feelings in the matter.

In this case, it would be hard to find anyone who would not argue with this decision, but it is the law, and as such, it must be obeyed.

Laws are designed to protect people - and ufortunately it means that for every innocent individual who remains safe from harm under this legislation, sooner or later, someone like this is also covered, and able to take advantage.

The legal system does not work on the basis of 'we enforce the law, unless we decide that someone is not deserving or its protection - in which case we do not enforce it in that case.

That would render all law utterly unworkable.

So, although in this case, application of the law appears wrong, it is still right in the wider sense, and this must be the way the legal system works until someone finds a better way - and simply arbitrarily deciding who does and who does not get protection based on what they may do, is not a basis for a workable legal system.

[jake-the-peg]

I think oldNitro and JoeLuke ought to go live in a country like China for a while where people do 'disappear'.

Robespierre was a great one for arbitary justice and just shortcutting proper justice too.

Now what ever became of him?

Sadly the only thing we learn from history is that people don't learn from it.

Trying to short cut the law:
http://media.myspacep...oples/peoples_194.gif

[Ann]

Grrrrr - this country is getting worse!!

[Zeuhl]

Compared with where?

[emmie]

It's amazing to me how so many people circumvent the law and get away with it. Yet in these cases, one sniff of being deported, they are off to the nearest legal aid ambulance chaser citing human rights. I would like to know just when the law will be changed, if that what it takes, so these people cannot under any circumstances remain in Britain. They may get prison, tagged even, but that is useless for the most part, they are still here, and at tax payers expense. If they fear retribution from their home countries well so much the better. If you hate a place, the way they seem to why do they want to stay.

[naomi24]

If the penalty was always instant deportation, and they really feared retribution in their home countries instead of using it as an excuse, perhaps they'd think twice.

[DaisyNonna]

Law is not always equatable with justice.

[oldnitro]

Jake, believe it or not there is a war being waged against terror, and this guy and others like him are the enemy. I have yet to see or hear of any war that was won on the basis of political correctness or following the so called rules of war. These people don`t care about how dirty it gets and if we are going to beat them then we have to be dirtier

[Dolt]

As Naomi24 says, ."If the penalty was always instant deportation, and they really feared retribution in their home countries instead of using it as an excuse, perhaps they'd think twice"
Why do they come here in the first place? are they not looking for a safe haven?
The EU country's are to soft on these people, they're all woried about being PC, I'd have more respect for our goverments if they'd admit what we all know.

[andy-hughes]

oldnitro - the 'war on terror' is a meaningless phrase dreamed up by a meaningless president to justify his gung ho foreign policy.

It's not possible to wage war on an abstract concept, you might as well have a 'war on bad weather' - and it has about the same effect.

[oldnitro]

Andy-hughes, try telling the thousands of victims of car bombs and suicide bombers that the fight against terror is meaningless. Do you advocate just copping it and hoping it will all just go away. In the words of Colonel Nathan T. Jessup..." Son, you can`t handle the truth"

[andy-hughes]

oldnitro - it is not the fight against terrorist activities that I object to, obviously, it is the need to tie it up in a 'one-phrase-fits-all' soundbite by a man who thinks he has a mandate to force his belief in a system of government on another nation by military invasion.

The notion of who is a terrorist depends entirely on where you live, and whose rifle barrel you get to stare down.

It is the flippant attitude of Mr Bush which is reprehensible, not the actual need to fight against terrorism.

'War on terrorism' - necessary action to maintain a free world. 'War on terror' - meaningless nonsense.

It's not the concept I have issues with, it's the media manipulation.

Nowhere did I suggest that I would hope for terrorism to go away - and at fifty-six with four grandchildren, I am beyond being called 'Son' even in a third party quote, and I have no problem with dealing with the truth.

I hope this clears up any misunderstanding between us.

[tigerlelly]

zeuhl, presumably compared with how this country used to be!

[oldnitro]

Andy-hughes, now I know where your coming from and I agree with you completely. War against terrorism is a much better way of putting it. Forgive my flippant use of the word "Son"