Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Why do protesters hide behind masks?
The protesters who are camped out on the steps of Saint Paul's Cathedral, most of them have their faces covered either with a mask or a scarf, surely if you believe in what you are protesting about, you wouldn't be bothered about being 'seen'
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Basically they have gone soft. Protests have been made about many things over a long period of time and it's only comparatively recently that they have covered their faces. I witnessed a number of protests during the sixties and in spite of the police taking photographs, nobody wore a mask or a scarf. They were proud of what they were doing and wanted to be seen.
Bobbisox
Legitimate and peaceful protesters are routinely added to police/Government databases.
http://www.guardian.c...lves-police-databases
Legitimate and peaceful protesters are routinely added to police/Government databases.
http://www.guardian.c...lves-police-databases
AOG
Everyone has the right to protest in this country. They are not being arrested or moved on because they are not breaking the law. They are not being treated favourably. If you want to join a demonstration SUPPORTING the bankers you are free to do so, and as long as you do not break the law, you will not be treated any differently.
Everyone has the right to protest in this country. They are not being arrested or moved on because they are not breaking the law. They are not being treated favourably. If you want to join a demonstration SUPPORTING the bankers you are free to do so, and as long as you do not break the law, you will not be treated any differently.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
But surley if they are being tracked and photographed they are under investigation so your argument disappears?
What I find ironic is that it is unlikley many of these people work for a living. They will be sons and daughters of the wealthy or part of the great unwashed. This is borne out by the obvious fact they are not at work for long periods of time. Hypocritical or what?
What I find ironic is that it is unlikley many of these people work for a living. They will be sons and daughters of the wealthy or part of the great unwashed. This is borne out by the obvious fact they are not at work for long periods of time. Hypocritical or what?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.