We could see our clocks permanently wound forward by an hour for good from next year.
But only if Scotland agrees to it.
Why should we consider Scotland, isn't it about time England had a say in things?
If Scotland wants to retain the annual 'on a hour' 'back an hour', fiasco let them, there is no reason why both countries can't be on a different time system, is there?
the typing has gone to pot. Perhaps England could be on a different time zone to Scotland, if the Scots prefer. That way we could have longer daylight hours. And i wouldn't go into hibernation quite so early in the winter.
Well I live right in the South and I want to keep the switch as it is so I support Scotland's argument. Most of Europe change their clocks too, we can't all be involved in a fiasco surely.
At the moment it is still dark in Edinburgh at 8am - also Britain has GMT - and I thought we all wanted out of the European Union! I remember when they tried it in the 70s and it was an absolute fiasco and most of England wanted to go back to ther status quo, never mind Scotland.