Road rules0 min ago
Time we had compulsory voting?
Should we have a referendum on compulsory voting.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by rod. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Imagine what would they do if there were such a law, and nobody voted? Lock us all up? Now that is a policy which the current government seems to be pursuing anyway.
The benefits are that we would get a true represenatation of what the country thinks. Politicians would not be able to claim a mandate from getting 40% of the vote in a 57% turnout, for example. They might actually try and work together, or come up with good ways of doing things. As long as their is a box that is 'none of the above' for you to tick I don't see why it should be a problem. Also fining non-voters would raise funds and could reduce some forms of tax (though even I would cast a cynical eye at that).
Could someone explain what the benefits of the current system are? It strikes me that the right not to vote is the right to be told what to do, or the right to have a government imposed on you. The compulsory system provides a much better way of showing you protest in my opinion. This way you will not be lumped together with those who can't be bothered to vote.
Italy got rid of PR about 10 years ago and has had about two or three governments in that time. Ireland has PR and coalition governments. They have consensus politics and far less bickering in their parliament. Everyone is fairly represented.
However, how would you enforce a compulsory vote? And what would you suggest as a punishment for not voting?
the french system of voting is pretty good - you vote for the party you support in the first round, and the second round is a 'lesser-of-two-evils' vote. here, it seems that many people compromise their stance by voting for one of the top two parties, which sets up a cycle that results in the majority of people voting for labour or cons, regardless of whether they represent their views or not.
(can i have a vote now?)
Having to vote for which of the parties I would like to sell off the NHS to private business, or which one I would like to see implement draconian asylum quotas is not something I would want to be forced to do.
No we shouldn't. I have never voted in a general election, I don't feel that I know enough about politics to cast a vote for any particular party. Yes, I am aware that I should take an interest but hey, this question isn't about that.
So, if voting were compulsory, I would abstain. Surely this is the same as not voting in the first place?
�But I don�t do politics �well we all do one way or another. One of the benefits of compulsory voting is we all get the government the majority has voted for. I don�t like the idea of proportional representation as you end up with weak government just look at the situation in, Italy an election every six months!
No, we wouldn't get a government which the majority has voted for - because even with a turnout of 100% the winning party would probably still only have about 40% of the votes. In Italy they do not have "an election every six months". In Italy there have been fewer general elections since 1945 than in the UK. In Italy, most governments had a broad basde of support under PR. Under PR, no fascist or communist parties were ever in government. Since Italy abolished PR, most governments have included elements of former fascist or communist parties.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.