ChatterBank56 mins ago
Guilty yes . . .
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Good point, Howard. I was more referring to the first cop who approached the car and clearly over-reacted. Surely swinging his truncheon with such force at the window could have caused serious injuries to someone sitting next to it. No doubt the 'Old Bill' would have pleaded self-defence. Shameful actions in my opinion.
-- answer removed --
Initially it looks horrendous - then the more you read, the less sympathy you have for the driver.
He drove over a policeman's foot, drove 8 miles with blues & twos sounding behind him, only stopped when road-blocked and then locked the door to prevent it being opened.
He could have had a shotgun in there - why wouldn't you use 'distraction techniques' to make sure he didn't/couldn't use it.
All wrong that he gets a jackpot payout - spineless legal numpties letting the front line police down.
He drove over a policeman's foot, drove 8 miles with blues & twos sounding behind him, only stopped when road-blocked and then locked the door to prevent it being opened.
He could have had a shotgun in there - why wouldn't you use 'distraction techniques' to make sure he didn't/couldn't use it.
All wrong that he gets a jackpot payout - spineless legal numpties letting the front line police down.
At first I thought this was going to be a poor little flat capped OAP in an old Metro.
Turns out he was in a black Range Rover on personalised plates with illegally blacked out windows. He drove off while the police were dealing with him, and failed to stop for eight miles.
My sympathy for him is now vastly reduced.
Turns out he was in a black Range Rover on personalised plates with illegally blacked out windows. He drove off while the police were dealing with him, and failed to stop for eight miles.
My sympathy for him is now vastly reduced.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
< sigh >
but not by any court.
The police legal team took a pragmatic (but unfortunate) view that most people would have the same anti-police knee-jerk response that seems all to prevalent today. So they settled out of court "without admitting any liability".
The officers concerned were not 'retired' ...
" The two Pcs, who have not been named, were removed from front-line duty and were subject to an internal disciplinary hearing held behind closed doors.
But they pair were allowed back on duty after being cleared of any wrong-doing.
Gwent Police said the two officers ‘met the highest standards of professional behaviour’. "
but not by any court.
The police legal team took a pragmatic (but unfortunate) view that most people would have the same anti-police knee-jerk response that seems all to prevalent today. So they settled out of court "without admitting any liability".
The officers concerned were not 'retired' ...
" The two Pcs, who have not been named, were removed from front-line duty and were subject to an internal disciplinary hearing held behind closed doors.
But they pair were allowed back on duty after being cleared of any wrong-doing.
Gwent Police said the two officers ‘met the highest standards of professional behaviour’. "
-- answer removed --