Editor's Blog5 mins ago
Is Bradford now mostly muslim?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Or is there another explanation as to why they'd elect Saddam's bets mate?
Or is there another explanation as to why they'd elect Saddam's bets mate?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by d9f1c7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No less than 20% are Muslim, maybe people are just sick of not having a legitimate option in the labour party ( who let's face it might as well be the conservatives) and who went into a war that costs the lives of thousands worldwide on the premise of lies and deciet. I'd personally like to see Blair and B ush indicted as war criminals but this cheered me up this morning and will have to do.
But the turnout was only 50%.
And if a high majority of Muslims / Asians come out to vote (26% of the population), then almost half the people voting could be Muslim / Asian.
And remember that almost all the problems we have had in the UK with "scam" postal voting has been Asian related so it would not surprise me if many of the people who postal voted actually had no idea they actually DID postal vote.
And if a high majority of Muslims / Asians come out to vote (26% of the population), then almost half the people voting could be Muslim / Asian.
And remember that almost all the problems we have had in the UK with "scam" postal voting has been Asian related so it would not surprise me if many of the people who postal voted actually had no idea they actually DID postal vote.
You're all entitled to your opinions, I'm entitled to mine and that is that there is no such thing as a truly principled poilitician but there are men who stand up and say what they believe whether that's popular or not- and I think on this occasion that's paid dividends for Galloway, so yes he's more principled than most politicians, is that simple enough for you?
read this and tell me Galloway's acted any differently from Thatcher
http://www.guardian.c...feb/28/iraq.politics1
£1 billion spent propping up Saddam
http://www.guardian.c...feb/28/iraq.politics1
£1 billion spent propping up Saddam
<<In 1994, Galloway faced some of his strongest criticism on his return from a Middle-Eastern visit during which he had met Saddam Hussein "to try and bring about an end to sanctions, suffering and war". At the meeting, he reported the support given to Saddam by the people of the Gaza Strip and ended his speech in English with the statement "Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability". In a January 2007 edition of the BBC's Hardtalk he stated that he was saluting the "Iraqi people". Galloway's speech was translated for Hussein. Anasal-Tikriti, a friend of Galloway's and a Respect candidate, spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain said: "I understand Arabic and it [Galloway's salutation] was taken completely out of context. When he said "you" he meant the Iraqi people, he was saluting their indefatigability, their resolve against sanctions. Even the interpreter got it right and, in Arabic, says salutes the stand of the Iraqi people'.">>
Hope that clears up the misunderstanding for you, d9f1c7 ?
Hope that clears up the misunderstanding for you, d9f1c7 ?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.