News works like that. The press suddenly notices a type of case, but doesn't play it up. But it thinks "We missed the opportunity. Next one that comes up, we'll give it everything, right from the off". Doubtless, kids were being bitten by dogs. When this was noticed, two things happened. The next one got big coverage and others got reported widely when they wouldn't have been. You may recall this happening.
These particular Pakistani Asians are just the same, in one way, as thieves who nick from cars; they are opportunists. If a satnav or a wallet is on view, the thieves nick it. They are out looking for easy pickings. Girls in care and under Social Services are often easy pickings. Ordinary young girls are not; if something like that to our daughters, there'd be trouble. And the offenders know that the girls they pick are either not going to complain or, if they do, are not likely to be believed. That's what happened in Rochdale. The first girl was 15. She got arrested because she was hammering on the counter of a kebab shop, shouting and making a disturbance. She then reported that she'd been raped. DNA,which later turned out to be of the 59 year-old ringleader, was found on her underwear. Nothing was done about it. She was thought unreliable. At a guess, someone thought that any sex was consensual or could be alleged so, and the jury would have acquitted, even assuming that the man was identified.
Nine months later, the new chief prosecutor revived the case, perhaps because other complaints were appearing and a pattern emerging, possibly because he knew the Pakistani community, being Pakistani himself, and gave the complaint more credence, possibly both those reasons.
Police are not likely to dismiss such complaints and complainants so readily in future.
We may expect wide coverage of all these cases from now on, too..