ChatterBank1 min ago
Playing both sides
For a man who fought supposed "British oppression" he certainly seems to have changed his tune.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ ...hern -irelan d-19208 018
Bet he didn't claim to be a British subject when he was planning murder with his comrades?
http://
Bet he didn't claim to be a British subject when he was planning murder with his comrades?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Duncer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think you are confusing thing substantially here. A man's political motivations make no difference to his nationality in law nor to where most of his business interests lie. He was facing bankruptcy and would have taken legal advice on that, the legal advice being that he was born in what the world considers to be part of the UK, nothing to do with his personal opinion, so I think pretty much it's a non story, it's just business.
Not really, you are entitled to dual nationality under the terms of the Good Friday agreement, as is he. He was using his citizenship as a convenient calling card in court. I was able to hold both passports in the 1980's and, as he is roughly the same age as me, I suspect he would have too. I wonder what his passport tells us about his nationality?