ChatterBank9 mins ago
Should we be paying to facilitate this tory MP's pillow talk?
http:// www.dai lymail. ...less ons-exp enses.h tml
Almost makes having your moat cleaned or getting a duck house seem respectable.
Almost makes having your moat cleaned or getting a duck house seem respectable.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// The Grantham MP met Mr Meshulam on a Conservative Friends of Israel trip and they had a civil ceremony last March. //
That's just taking things too far.
// He is not the first MP to put language lessons on expenses.
Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt charged taxpayers over £3,000 to learn Mandarin after marrying a Chinese woman. //
Wonder why the homophobic Daily Mail lead this story with the gay MP when Hunt, who is a more senior and a Cabinet Minister claimed 5 times more expenses
That's just taking things too far.
// He is not the first MP to put language lessons on expenses.
Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt charged taxpayers over £3,000 to learn Mandarin after marrying a Chinese woman. //
Wonder why the homophobic Daily Mail lead this story with the gay MP when Hunt, who is a more senior and a Cabinet Minister claimed 5 times more expenses
You can claim for language lessons on Self Assessment forms and it is a deductable expense if it is essential to your job.
Learning the language of your foreign partner is not going to improve an MPs skills or ability to represent his/her constituency. This perk needs to be tightened and only allowed if it is work related not for personal gain.
Learning the language of your foreign partner is not going to improve an MPs skills or ability to represent his/her constituency. This perk needs to be tightened and only allowed if it is work related not for personal gain.
Gromit
/// Wonder why the homophobic Daily Mail lead this story with the gay MP when Hunt, who is a more senior and a Cabinet Minister claimed 5 times more expenses ///
Perhaps it was because the Daily Mail lead with that story, one year ago.
http:// www.dai lymail. ...y-le arn-Man darin.h tml
/// Wonder why the homophobic Daily Mail lead this story with the gay MP when Hunt, who is a more senior and a Cabinet Minister claimed 5 times more expenses ///
Perhaps it was because the Daily Mail lead with that story, one year ago.
http://
I think you're being a bit mean spirited about what "they" and "we" can do.
I worked for a company that paid for us all to have German Lessons (not that it did me mucjh good)
My current company is recompensing me for expenditure on my masters degree I'm currently studying
I think that the reason that this is being highlighted is that there is an implication that his motivation for studying Hebrew is personal and not professional.
I'm sure he'd point out his Israeli links - in response I'd point out that his association with Tory friends of Israel is a party political interest and not a Government or constituancy one.
Perhaps he has a professional reason for studying this bu lst I heard Grantham wasn't a particularly Jewish Town
I worked for a company that paid for us all to have German Lessons (not that it did me mucjh good)
My current company is recompensing me for expenditure on my masters degree I'm currently studying
I think that the reason that this is being highlighted is that there is an implication that his motivation for studying Hebrew is personal and not professional.
I'm sure he'd point out his Israeli links - in response I'd point out that his association with Tory friends of Israel is a party political interest and not a Government or constituancy one.
Perhaps he has a professional reason for studying this bu lst I heard Grantham wasn't a particularly Jewish Town
No, we shouldn't. A company or an individual will pay tax on any expenditure which is not an expense essential to their business.MPs' salaries should have the same rule applied. This benefit is not essential to the MP's job, but personal: it's hard to see how language lessons would be a justified expense for any MP, since few of them deal with foreigners as part of their work and those that do would need to be fluent, an unlikely outcome. That's what interpreters are for. It should be treated as part of taxable income but I bet it won't be !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.