Quizzes & Puzzles8 mins ago
Are we REALLY a nation of b******s...?
Or are people simply giving Mr Clarkson a bit of his own medicine, humour-wise?
http:// www.tel egraph. ...te-a nd-utte r-bds.h tml
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think he invited the comments he received. It was copied and pasted in the papers....He had a ridiculous profile picture with "googly eyed glasses" and simply said "my dog died today" Nothing else. No emotion. He has insulted so many people in the past with no thought to how they may feel about his comments. Whilst I don't condone the harsh and sarcastic comments he recieved....he really was asking for it.
-- answer removed --
What JC said about shooting strikers was a tongue in cheek comment. Tweeting abuse about a family pet that died is in no way comparable. The people posting these tweets had no idea how upset JC felt about his dog dying - regardless of how naive he was posting it.
Not sure about us being a nation of whatevers but we seem to be becoming a nation of spineless, faceless internet bullies.
Not sure about us being a nation of whatevers but we seem to be becoming a nation of spineless, faceless internet bullies.
no, but Clarkson must know that posting stuff on twitter, no matter how inane, or in this case personal will elicit a response, not necessarily the one that you would want. Answer is to delete twitter, facebook accounts, and don't tell people your personal stuff, there are some noodles out there who happily will slate you for no known reason.
I think trolls are pretty disgusting, but JC to me, seems like 'Super Troll'..only he doesn't use Twitter to make his 'jokes':
http:// www.car buzz.co ...y-Cl arkson- Complai nts
http://
Clarkson is great - for my money just about the funniest writer writing today and worth the price of The Sunday Times on his own.
He is deliberately controversial often using laugh out loud comic hyperbole, metaphors and similies - that's what he does - and therefore anybody who gets upset by it is, frankly, a bit of an idiot.
The Speciale Needs and George Michael quotes in sp's link are excellent examples of Clarkson's style - and both, for my money, are extremely funny.
It seems to be fashionable to dislike Clarkson, which is fine - he isn't everybody's cup of tea - but what I don't understand is that the dislike is usually along the lines of "Clarkson is a C**t" or similar, and I find that a bit, well, odd.
I can't stand Toynbee, because I don't like her politics, but that doesn't make her a tw*t.
He is deliberately controversial often using laugh out loud comic hyperbole, metaphors and similies - that's what he does - and therefore anybody who gets upset by it is, frankly, a bit of an idiot.
The Speciale Needs and George Michael quotes in sp's link are excellent examples of Clarkson's style - and both, for my money, are extremely funny.
It seems to be fashionable to dislike Clarkson, which is fine - he isn't everybody's cup of tea - but what I don't understand is that the dislike is usually along the lines of "Clarkson is a C**t" or similar, and I find that a bit, well, odd.
I can't stand Toynbee, because I don't like her politics, but that doesn't make her a tw*t.
""A few moments ago , my dog died, and, as an experiment, I announced the fact on Twitter."
As an experiment...? Sounds like nonsense to me.
I don't have any sympathy for Clarkson on this matter. I don't wish death on him or his dog or anything like that, but I think generally speaking anything that's written on the internet should be assumed as laden with sarcasm.
When people write responses like 'good' or 'how does she smell?', what they're implicitly doing is taking the p1ss of the fact that the news has been put out there at all. Personally, I think it's fair game. :/
As an experiment...? Sounds like nonsense to me.
I don't have any sympathy for Clarkson on this matter. I don't wish death on him or his dog or anything like that, but I think generally speaking anything that's written on the internet should be assumed as laden with sarcasm.
When people write responses like 'good' or 'how does she smell?', what they're implicitly doing is taking the p1ss of the fact that the news has been put out there at all. Personally, I think it's fair game. :/